Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
While I can see calling Philly a "cookie cutter" urban environment (as whole blocks and neighborhoods were built to one plan), Pittsburgh is not for the most part. Sure, it has a lot of rowhouses, but these were generally built as singletons or in small groups of 2-6. It's very rare you'd see single row take up an entire block even back in the day, and with modern demolitions, there are probably less than ten such blocks left in the entire region.
@eschaton-My point was that "cookie cutter" ism isn't new.
Of course it's not. Even people who don't think that urban cookie-cutter exists think it's existed since Levittown, which was what, - over 65 years ago now?
I said in other threads that I think the basic point for "industrial level" construction of neighborhoods tended to be around 1900 or so. So you have early Victorian neighborhoods (say built out in 1870) which seem very heterogeneous and chaotic, and late Victorian ones (built out around 1910) which otherwise have similar form but tend to be much more monotonous.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.