Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-23-2014, 11:43 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
There really isn't any school that is affordable to me; ineligible for financial aid.
Ineligible for financial aid? I find that hard to believe. The only people I have known that were ineligible were people who had parents that made enough and they still lived with their parents. I am sure you could qualify for financial aid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-24-2014, 12:05 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Ineligible for financial aid? I find that hard to believe. The only people I have known that were ineligible were people who had parents that made enough and they still lived with their parents. I am sure you could qualify for financial aid.

Ah, I am one of those evil student loan defaulters Reagan warned you (or your parents) about; as a result I have an ongoing garnishment.
To get my loans out of default I would have to voluntarily pay an equal amount on top of the garnishment for nine consecutive months; that's not going to happen until either income improves or expenses decline.

In the meantime, borrowers not in default and with more income than I can qualify for monthly payments of zero under the Income Based Repayment (IBR) program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Ah, I am one of those evil student loan defaulters Reagan warned you (or your parents) about; as a result I have an ongoing garnishment.
To get my loans out of default I would have to voluntarily pay an equal amount on top of the garnishment for nine consecutive months; that's not going to happen until either income improves or expenses decline.

In the meantime, borrowers not in default and with more income than I can qualify for monthly payments of zero under the Income Based Repayment (IBR) program.
Do you have student loans you defaulted on? Sounds like you created much of your own problems....you can't really expect others to fix your own mistakes. Which makes this a weird thread for you to create. What exactly does this have to do with parking requirements for new apartment buildings?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 09:11 AM
 
4,538 posts, read 6,445,137 times
Reputation: 3481
People who dont drive often want a spot, unless they are a hermit as folks visting, handimen, etc nee da place to park
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
5,525 posts, read 13,944,069 times
Reputation: 3908
I think the question comes down to whether people who live in the neighborhood are (legally or morally) entitled to a parking spot on the street or not. If they are, then any new construction which significantly increases the car density will harm the existing neighbors unless it also correspondingly increases the amount of parking. If the existing neighbors do not, then the newcomers have just as much right to street parking as they do, and if that makes available street parking more difficult to find, that's just too bad.

In environments where car ownership is not an option, its more understandable that there should be mechanisms to preserve parking access. In certain limited environments (i.e. NYC, parts of Chicago, SF, DC, etc), there are viable alternatives to driving, so it is possible to increase population without increase the number of cars. In this areas, mandatory parking minimums should not be imposed.

Obviously, we know that in real life, the incumbents will always claim a right to street parking whether such a legal right exists or not. In general, incumbent residents will tend to oppose any kind of development which increases the number of residents and/or cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Oh, God, not morality again! Please leave morality out of it.

If an apartment building has enough street frontage to provide parking for say, six cars, yet has 100 apartments (say it's a 3-4 story building) and NO offstreet parking, that's a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 10:19 AM
 
2,090 posts, read 3,573,997 times
Reputation: 2390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Oh, God, not morality again! Please leave morality out of it.

If an apartment building has enough street frontage to provide parking for say, six cars, yet has 100 apartments (say it's a 3-4 story building) and NO offstreet parking, that's a problem.
Why is it a problem? Those who don't need or want parking can live there. Those that don't like it can not live there and instead live another place that has offstreet parking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
5,525 posts, read 13,944,069 times
Reputation: 3908
Yeah, its actually better to stick to legal rights. Unless there's a zoned or resident permit parking system in place, its very difficult to claim that a current resident has a right to park on the street. Likewise, unless there's a system in place where pre-existing residents have street parking rights, but new residents do not (and I don't know if such a system would be Constitutional), incumbent residents don't really have a legal leg to stand on in terms of complaining about difficulty of parking due to new construction. This is why residents rely on the political process to prevent these kinds of situations from developing.

As I was kind of inferring, however, most people think that if they are currently parking on the street without difficulty, they should forever be guaranteed easy street parking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by stateofnature View Post
Why is it a problem? Those who don't need or want parking can live there. Those that don't like it can not live there and instead live another place that has offstreet parking.
Right. And you know what happens? Someone moves there thinking they don't need/want a car, and bingo! They get a job that requires commuting. Next thing you know, they're buying a car. Or they simply decide life w/o a car isn't what it's cracked up to be. What are you going to do? Kick people out if they buy a car?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 10:47 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Oh, God, not morality again! Please leave morality out of it.

If an apartment building has enough street frontage to provide parking for say, six cars, yet has 100 apartments (say it's a 3-4 story building) and NO offstreet parking, that's a problem.

What about incumbent carless residents who say they need new apartments in order to maintain affordability?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top