U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-28-2015, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Vallejo
14,057 posts, read 16,066,811 times
Reputation: 12630

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
I still can't understand BART building a billion dollar expansion into Silicon Valley when there is already Caltrain.
It isn't. BART has operated in Silicon Valley for decades. Where they're further expanding coverage in the Silicon Valley is in a completely different area than Caltrain will ever serve. Eventually they might connect, but as is the closest the BART expansion is slated to get is about four miles away from Caltrain. From there it diverges out. Caltrain runs up one side of the Bay, BART the other.

Last edited by Malloric; 02-28-2015 at 11:38 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-01-2015, 09:45 AM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
7,129 posts, read 9,899,963 times
Reputation: 6423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnutella View Post
How exactly do you "carve up" a city with something that goes around it?

By the way, I wholeheartedly agree that there should be more investment in public transit, but letting highway infrastructure rot is not the way to do it. And while I understand that the United States let its rail infrastructure rot for several decades, I also understand that two wrongs don't make a right. We deserve both modern public transit and modern highways. The "invest in every mode of transportation except highways" contingency is just as clueless as the "invest in highways only" contingency.
Good post, I agree. We need to invest in both rail and highways. We are not living in the 1850s or the 1950s either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top