Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yeah, those tenements would certainly be illegal to build today. The H with zoning! The H with building codes. No more water and sewage treatment. Bring back cholera and typhoid, also TB from overcrowding. LET THE MARKET DECIDE! (Brought to you by the Libertarian Party, US)
Have you forgotten basic economics? If you knew even a little about NYC's history, you would know that it attracted a ton of poor immigrants who came to the US with very little. If they could afford something better than a tenement, they would've lived in that instead. But tenements were all they could afford. Later on, as these people became wealthier, they moved into nicer places.
Also, I wasn't only talking about tenements. Unless you think every building in NYC is a tenement. Yeah no good architecture. No luxury apartments. Just tenements...
Have you forgotten basic economics? If you knew even a little about NYC's history, you would know that it attracted a ton of poor immigrants who came to the US with very little. If they could afford something better than a tenement, they would've lived in that instead. But tenements were all they could afford. Later on, as these people became wealthier, they moved into nicer places.
Also, I wasn't only talking about tenements. Unless you think every building in NYC is a tenement. Yeah no good architecture. No luxury apartments. Just tenements...
I'm no economist, but I/we know enough to have built up a pretty good portfolio on the income of an IT person and a nurse.
No one should have to live in substandard, unsafe housing.
I certainly never said nor meant to imply that all housing in NYC is tenement housing.
I'm no economist, but I/we know enough to have built up a pretty good portfolio on the income of an IT person and a nurse.
No one should have to live in substandard, unsafe housing.
I certainly never said nor meant to imply that all housing in NYC is tenement housing.
What if substandard, unsafe housing is all they could afford? You say that no one should have to live in substandard, unsafe housing, but you don't say a solution. How does it make economic sense to forbid substandard housing? How do you do that without driving up the cost of housing? Excessive government regulation is what drives up housing costs. Instead of forbidding tenement housing, why not give people money in the form of welfare to buy better housing?
They also were built up organically over time without excessive zoning regulations. Most buildings in NYC would be illegal to build today. I wonder how a city today would develop organically.
The number for Manhattan is about 40%, not the majority. Doing a study for the entire city would be extremely involved.
The tenement building with the Thai restaurant and the 20 something guy on the fire escape with his laptop is one of those 40%. Reason: "Too many apartments"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarina Witt
Yeah, those tenements would certainly be illegal to build today. The H with zoning! The H with building codes. No more water and sewage treatment. Bring back cholera and typhoid, also TB from overcrowding. LET THE MARKET DECIDE! (Brought to you by the Libertarian Party, US)
Again, the reasons almost all involve lot height, coverage and density*. Lol, one of those included in the "illegal to build" is the Empire State Building. Reason: "Too much commercial density"
*To be fair, the study was only looking at density-related reasons. It excluded parking as well.
Here's an article on NYC tenements today, well 17 years ago. I think many of the apartments in them today aren't as tiny as the article describes but due to the layout can often be inconveniently narrow in parts
The ones in Chinatown are rundown and overcrowded; tends to happen in areas of poor immigrants in old housing
Mr. Papa runs the 1904 midblock tenement at 211 Madison Street, between Clinton and Rutgers Street. It is in a section of the city that is densely populated by Chinese immigrants, many of whom are crowded into small apartments with outmoded appliances and poorly functioning plumbing. ''I see cramped apartments, rodents, broken windows,'' Mr. Papa said.
Eighteen of the 20 apartments in 211 Madison have tubs in the kitchen and tiny toilet rooms, as they did nearly 100 years ago, Mr. Papa said. Rents average only $312 a month, although the existing tenants, faithful rent-payers, could probably pay twice that amount, he said. Mr. Papa said he hopes to get a low-interest city loan of about $20,000 an apartment to improve the building. He said he considers long-term owner negligence to be the principal cause of the building's conditions.
What if substandard, unsafe housing is all they could afford? You say that no one should have to live in substandard, unsafe housing, but you don't say a solution. How does it make economic sense to forbid substandard housing? How do you do that without driving up the cost of housing? Excessive government regulation is what drives up housing costs. Instead of forbidding tenement housing, why not give people money in the form of welfare to buy better housing?
No one should live in substandard housing. It's like minimum wage. There has to be a "floor" on what's considered safe. It makes economic sense to forbid substandard housing because we're supposed to be a somewhat compassionate society that cares about its members. I am always flabbergasted that people support substandard housing on this forum. We've had some threads about this too.
The tenement building with the Thai restaurant and the 20 something guy on the fire escape with his laptop is one of those 40%. Reason: "Too many apartments"
Again, the reasons almost all involve lot height, coverage and density*. Lol, one of those included in the "illegal to build" is the Empire State Building. Reason: "Too much commercial density"
*To be fair, the study was only looking at density-related reasons. It excluded parking as well.
Well, there are a lot of screwy studies. I'm talking basic safety stuff-access, egress, decent plumbing, wiring and the like. Interior rooms with no outside access/egress are generally considered unsafe, especially if the entire apt. is interior. Bad wiring can cause fires. Bad plumbing can spread disease. If density is too high, diseases like tubercolosis can spread more easily. All public buildings have occupancy limits, mainly due to how long it takes to evacuate in case of a fire or other disaster.
I think the authors know the building codes of NYC well; it's their field of work.
Quote:
I'm talking basic safety stuff-access, egress, decent plumbing, wiring and the like. Interior rooms with no outside access/egress are generally considered unsafe, especially if the entire apt. is interior. Bad wiring can cause fires. Bad plumbing can spread disease. If density is too high, diseases like tubercolosis can spread more easily.
As I said, little have that has to do with what is permissible to build today. Disease spreading isn't a big concern in very high density developed world cities. More likely, interperson contact including disease spreading is a bigger deal outside of the home regardless of density.
I think the authors know the building codes of NYC well; it's their field of work.
As I said, little have that has to do with what is permissible to build today. Disease spreading isn't a big concern in very high density developed world cities. More likely, interperson contact including disease spreading is a bigger deal outside of the home regardless of density.
I understand about the study not talking about what is permissible to build these days. The building codes are constantly changing, one hopes for the better. Do you recall that stuff from the book about Omaha from years ago that we discussed? Dirt floors, people getting bit by rats, etc. I can probably dig it up.
Symptoms and causes - Tuberculosis - Mayo Clinic "People who live or work in prisons, immigration centers or nursing homes are all at a higher risk of tuberculosis. That's because the risk of the disease is higher anywhere there is overcrowding and poor ventilation."
No one should live in substandard housing. It's like minimum wage. There has to be a "floor" on what's considered safe. It makes economic sense to forbid substandard housing because we're supposed to be a somewhat compassionate society that cares about its members. I am always flabbergasted that people support substandard housing on this forum. We've had some threads about this too.
Yes that would be shocking.
Unfortunately, we have people who value parking and square footage requirements more than basic standards. This means it's impossible to build new housing at low rents. It's a big part of the problem.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.