Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How would you rather live? urban/suburban
Single family home 1 or more acres of land on cul-de-sac no sidewalks (non walkable-suburban) 16 13.68%
Single family home .5 acre of land on cul-de-sac, with sidewalks, walking distance to a park or something similar.(suburban) 9 7.69%
Single family home with .15 acres of land, sidewalks, within walking distance to a park and small urban core (small shops etc-walkable suburban/urban) 31 26.50%
Townhouse, walkable to necessities and parks (walkable urban) 26 22.22%
Highrise/midrise, walkable to everything you can think of. (very walkable urban) 35 29.91%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-02-2008, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Scarsdale, NY
2,787 posts, read 11,496,911 times
Reputation: 802

Advertisements

Highrise/midrise, walkable to everything you can think of. (very walkable urban)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2008, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
314 posts, read 1,277,478 times
Reputation: 123
interesting responces! Love the pics of Scranton!!

question to everyone: Do you need the suburbs when you have a child?

What is the draw of the "driveable suburbanism" over "walkable urbanism" once a child is in the mix?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 03:31 PM
 
2,507 posts, read 8,559,693 times
Reputation: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by meadgrad View Post
interesting responces! Love the pics of Scranton!!

question to everyone: Do you need the suburbs when you have a child?

What is the draw of the "driveable suburbanism" over "walkable urbanism" once a child is in the mix?
Suburban schools are generally better, but it is somehow ingrained into our communal psyche that city school districts are bad. Do your homework, and chances are better than not that you can find a good, urban school.
A house on a quiet street has some debatable advantages for young children, but remember that they are yours for 18 years. By the time they are 15 and relegated to drinking out of bordem..well..some social stimulation and geographical independence would generally be good. Teenagers need more than a movie theater and a McDonald's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 03:32 PM
 
2,507 posts, read 8,559,693 times
Reputation: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike0421 View Post
How about 40 acres, away from it all? It seems as this is not an option!
It sure wasn't for emancipated slaves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 04:14 AM
 
Location: Cold Frozen North
1,928 posts, read 5,164,677 times
Reputation: 1307
We need another option of something like 10 acres or more in a rural area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 06:11 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
314 posts, read 1,277,478 times
Reputation: 123
I thought about putting a rural choice, but decided to concentrate on areas that are largely employment centers. I would love to live on a lake/river next to a mountain in Montana, but probably couldnt find work (but I'll be there in retirement!)! But I could live in Chicago, or Miami, or any other major/secondary city and resonably find work and have these lifestyle choices.

basically, what I am wondering also, is do people live in non walkable suburbia because they want to, or is it because they are forced to due to the lack of walkable product to buy (ie metro Atlanta, where I live, is vastly dominated by non walkable suburbia, so there could be a discrepency of where people live-non walkable suburbia- and where they would like to live-walkable urban/suburban-)

keep in mind walkable urban doesnt necessarly mean downtown New York or Chicago...it could be Oak Park Il outside Chicago, or Birmingham Michigan outside Detroit, or Wallingford outside Seattle...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 06:28 AM
 
Location: Living in Hampton, VA
504 posts, read 1,578,947 times
Reputation: 203
Gotta love the city environment. Always something to do. I lived in a urban area all my life and I don't regret it. IMO I'll take a condo in a high rise building with a view over a McMansion in a cookie cutter walmart suburb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Youngstown, Oh.
5,509 posts, read 9,486,726 times
Reputation: 5621
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Yes, it is 17 miles to the grocery store so I have to learn how to plan meals and think ahead.

Much better option than any of those given.

20yrsinBranson
I don't know if I'd call that better. Since I can't drive due to a visual impairment, it would take me about 7-8 hours to walk to the grocery store. I don't think I'd want to do that very often, so I'd have to buy a lot of stuff to last awhile. And then, I don't know how I could get that heavy load home. (and it would take another 7-8 hours) Because it's so far out, I must assume there's no mass-transit/bus service, right? I wonder how long it would take to get to work?

Quote:
Originally Posted by meadgrad View Post
basically, what I am wondering also, is do people live in non walkable suburbia because they want to, or is it because they are forced to due to the lack of walkable product to buy
That's an interesting question. Here in the midwest, there is plenty of "walkable product" available in the cities, but people stay away for other reasons. (i.e. bad schools and crime in city neighborhoods--whether these are real problems or not, people think they are) But, would they stay away from walkable suburbs, if they were available? I wish I had an answer for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Sun Diego, CA
521 posts, read 1,628,986 times
Reputation: 327
I chose the middle. I like the idea of having my own home where I can utilize my imagination and do anything with. Im also totally for the idea of having a backyard with a swimming pool that I can invite friends and family for bbq's and parties (and don't give me this crap about being able to do this on a rooftop). I don't need 3 different pizza shops and 5 bars within walking distance.

Though at my age right now, and being single, I live in a walkable urban area, but its still a home with a small backyard. Parking sucks sometimes though and I'd rather do without all the people constantly around, and the noise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 08:26 PM
 
Location: BUFFALO, NY
1,576 posts, read 5,346,055 times
Reputation: 327
Love the Urban!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top