Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2012, 06:44 PM
 
434 posts, read 552,412 times
Reputation: 153

Advertisements

The Iron Range in northern Minnesota is kind of a mess with sprawl. There aren't as many people as the cities you guys are talking about, but there's a small town here, and a small town there. These towns were build around the iron mines and the big piles or rock the mining companies left behind. There are maybe 70,000 people in an area the size of the Minneapolis - St. Paul metro area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2012, 03:42 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
36 posts, read 44,294 times
Reputation: 30
Jacksonville, OKC and Houston are great examples of urban sprawl
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 04:39 PM
 
Location: SoCal
1,242 posts, read 1,947,437 times
Reputation: 848
EVERY SINGLE CITY in the US suffers from sprawl. Naturaly Los Angeles get's thrown under the bus for it (and just about everything else) but LA is TINY compared to NYC, America's Urban poster child. NYC sprawls into 3 freaking states for crying outloud. Hello Pot, I'd like you to meet my friend Kettle

USATODAY.com - A comprehensive look at sprawl in America

According to that article (which all of you will discredit and ignore because it actually shows LA in a positive light - I know, blaphemy!) Los Angeles is one of the least sprawly cities. Many forget that LA Metro is the most densly populated Metro in the country, followed by San Francisco. It also points out that many western cities are limited on sprawl because geography limits them. Things like Mountains and lack of water tend to get in the way. Eastern Cities don't have those limitations and Southeastern Cities just do whatever the f**k they want.

The article lists the cities from most sprawly to least, and of the metros in the US of 1 million + , only 3 sprawl less than Los Angeles: San Diego, San Francisco and Miami.

Of course ALL of America's big cities sprawl - a lot. But I think the moral here is this: People in the Northeast should look a little closer to home before before they go around on their highhorse pointing fingers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 04:43 PM
 
1,185 posts, read 2,220,834 times
Reputation: 1009
^ Well NYC has 22 million people in its metro meanwhile la has about 17 million people in a area CLOSE to the size of nyc. Saying LA's metro is tiny compared to NYC is bs, riverside is techinically apart of LA's metro too. and NYC doesnt nessicarly sprawl in all corners of the 3 states, just the top third of new jersey, the southwest corner of connecticut and maybe 2 counties in nyc outside of the city
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 04:54 PM
 
Location: SoCal
1,242 posts, read 1,947,437 times
Reputation: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amercity View Post
^ Well NYC has 22 million people in its metro meanwhile la has about 17 million people in a area CLOSE to the size of nyc. Saying LA's metro is tiny compared to NYC is bs, riverside is techinically apart of LA's metro too. and NYC doesnt nessicarly sprawl in all corners of the 3 states, just the top third of new jersey, the southwest corner of connecticut and maybe 2 counties in nyc outside of the city
LA's footprint is. That's what I meant. But my point is still clear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2012, 06:28 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,210,835 times
Reputation: 10894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amercity View Post
^ Well NYC has 22 million people in its metro meanwhile la has about 17 million people in a area CLOSE to the size of nyc. Saying LA's metro is tiny compared to NYC is bs, riverside is techinically apart of LA's metro too. and NYC doesnt nessicarly sprawl in all corners of the 3 states, just the top third of new jersey, the southwest corner of connecticut and maybe 2 counties in nyc outside of the city
At least four counties in NYC outside the city; Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland. Though there are people commuting into NYC from as far as Poughkeepsie and northeast PA -- and more relevantly for "sprawl" purposes, real estate ads for NEPA which tout its nearness to the city. But "sprawl" is mostly a meaningless pejorative; some people seem to mean it as the growth of residential communities just outside the boundary (legal or practical) of an urban area, whereas others restrict it to only certain kinds of development, and still others include low-density growth in areas not particularly connected to a central city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,416,286 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amercity View Post
^ Well NYC has 22 million people in its metro meanwhile la has about 17 million people in a area CLOSE to the size of nyc. Saying LA's metro is tiny compared to NYC is bs, riverside is techinically apart of LA's metro too. and NYC doesnt nessicarly sprawl in all corners of the 3 states, just the top third of new jersey, the southwest corner of connecticut and maybe 2 counties in nyc outside of the city
Even if you combine L.A.'s UA with Riverside, that's 2280 sq miles (14.1 million people), a noticeably smaller footprint than New York's UA (3450 sq miles, 18.3 million).

L.A. + Riverside is actually smaller than Chicago's UA (2442 sq miles), with over 4.5 million more inhabitants. There are worse sprawl offenders than L.A., that's for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,416,286 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
Even if you combine L.A.'s UA with Riverside, that's 2280 sq miles (14.1 million people), a noticeably smaller footprint than New York's UA (3450 sq miles, 18.3 million).

L.A. + Riverside is actually smaller than Chicago's UA (2442 sq miles), with over 4.5 million more inhabitants. There are worse sprawl offenders than L.A., that's for sure.
Sorry, I meant 5.5. million more inhabitants.

L.A. + Riverside UAs = 2280 sq miles, 14.1 million people
Chicago UA = 2442 sq miles, 8.6 million people
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:57 PM
 
Location: Back in the Southland
1,054 posts, read 1,792,765 times
Reputation: 588
I read somewhere that LA has the densest metropolitan area in the US. Not sure if that is true or not, I'm sure someone here can provide that answer though :P
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2012, 09:55 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,478,433 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
My issue with this method is that it's non-standard. That always raises red flags for me. Someone's trying to pull something over. And a person's credentials do matter, although people can be gullible.
I'd like to point out the census bureau has adopted weighted density as well!

Standard methods can have pitfalls if misapplied. For example, using the standard density of Denver is somewhat misleading since a third of the area is used for an airport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top