Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2010, 04:13 PM
 
Location: where my heart is
5,643 posts, read 9,658,081 times
Reputation: 1661

Advertisements

Actually, Florida is losing population, not gaining. Whether that will change any congressional seats remains to be seen. It certainly won't ADD another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2010, 05:05 PM
 
1,712 posts, read 3,102,641 times
Reputation: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by TANaples View Post
Actually, Florida is losing population, not gaining. Whether that will change any congressional seats remains to be seen. It certainly won't ADD another.
New York Population and Components of Change

Florida Population and Components of Change

Florida is gaining although not as fast as before. New york is growing slower though
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2010, 05:24 PM
 
Location: where my heart is
5,643 posts, read 9,658,081 times
Reputation: 1661
Believe a realtor, who needs to sell a whole lot of houses, or a university. Take your pick.

Florida loses population for the first time since World War II - St. Petersbur

Another fault with that realtor list, is that is doesn't account for a signifcant factor in Florida, SNOWBIRDS. How many of those people buying houses in Florida are buying them to become full time residents as opposed to vacation/seasonal residents, or even investors? I would give more credit to the number of new Florida drivers licenses issued, or the number of van lines leaving Florida, which the University used.

Last edited by TANaples; 02-15-2010 at 05:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2010, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
882 posts, read 2,245,331 times
Reputation: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucidus View Post
I think California will probably lose a seat. It has been hit been hit really hard by unemployment and even tho people don't talk about it much, illegal aliens are starting to leave the U.S. Many of those illegals who leave will be "from" California.
Actually immigration to CA is still high and gaining, but domestic migration is where CA is on the losing end. In the end, CA is still positive, I think, and have even seen some reports that list CA as gaining a seat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2010, 09:22 PM
 
1,012 posts, read 2,560,068 times
Reputation: 462
Arizona has shown a strong gain since 2000, but the growth has hit a cliff since 2007. Arizona went from being the #2 fastest-growing state in the 1990s to like 12th since 2007. The hemmoraging of j-o-b-s and the foreclosures mess is the biggest culprit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2010, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Chicago
721 posts, read 1,793,937 times
Reputation: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by krock1dk View Post
Arizona has shown a strong gain since 2000, but the growth has hit a cliff since 2007. Arizona went from being the #2 fastest-growing state in the 1990s to like 12th since 2007. The hemmoraging of j-o-b-s and the foreclosures mess is the biggest culprit.
That's what almost all the sunbelt is dealing with
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2010, 09:42 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, WA
780 posts, read 1,343,764 times
Reputation: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by krock1dk View Post
Arizona has shown a strong gain since 2000, but the growth has hit a cliff since 2007. Arizona went from being the #2 fastest-growing state in the 1990s to like 12th since 2007. The hemmoraging of j-o-b-s and the foreclosures mess is the biggest culprit.
Yep, and with Nevada having the 2nd highest unemployment ( only after Michigan ), and the highest foreclosure rate in the nation, and receiving the least amount of stimulus funds, I can't imagine they would be gaining that much in population ( even though Vegas was one of the fastest growing cities up till about 2 or 3 yrs ago. ) Hundreds are fleeing the area now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2010, 10:49 PM
 
3,969 posts, read 13,663,701 times
Reputation: 1576
Yes, this 2010 snapshot will be quite interesting in that while states like Arizona, Nevada, Florida, and even California experienced rapid growth in the first half of the decade, the second half has been significantly slowed. California will probably come out OK due to the foreign immigration. The others will see a signficantly lower growth rate due to the the past three years of foreclosures, net population loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2010, 12:10 PM
 
1,588 posts, read 4,062,127 times
Reputation: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by krock1dk View Post
Here's my prediction for the largest METRO areas:

New York, NY-NJ 19 mill
Los Angeles, CA 17 mill
Chicago, IL-IN 10 mill
Dallas-Ft. Worth 7 mill
Philadelphia, PA-NJ
Washington DC-Baltimore, VA-MD
Bay Area of CA
Houston
Miami
Boston
Pheonix-Mesa
Detroit
Denver
St. Louis
Minneapolis-St. Paul
San Diego
Minneapolis - St. Paul and San Diego surpassed by Denver and St. Louis? That's very unlikely. Here are the latest numbers for each metropolitan area:

MPLS. - STPL.: 3,229,878
San Diego: 3,027,497
St. Louis: 2,816,710
Denver: 2,506,626

And where is Seattle?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2010, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
882 posts, read 2,245,331 times
Reputation: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dncr View Post
That's what almost all the sunbelt is dealing with
The correct word to bold and underline would be "almost". There, fixed it for you. While growth everywhere has slowed, even in the Sunbelt, I can assure that a few states in the Sunbelt haven't hit a growth "cliff" like Arizona.

Texas is still leading the nation in most aspects of population growth. I'm not saying its booming, just reminding you that TX has not fallen off the growth chart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top