U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Vancouver area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-31-2017, 09:40 AM
 
2 posts, read 774 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

We just bought our house about a year ago and our neighbor offered to sell us a piece of their property which is already cleared. This would be nice to be able to build a shop.

Talking to the land use dept @ the county and they're saying that our lots are non-conforming. They were legal at the time the houses were built, but since then, zoning has changed to r-5. We're both slightly under 5 acres. They say the only thing we could do is an equal swap of land, which does me no good.

This just seems maddening, especially because our sale was recorded improperly cause the title company had the wrong legal description, so a big chunk of our land is now legally owned by the sellers. So if they were able to do that; make my new sale less acreage than before, why couldn't that be done again?

Why can't someone do whatever they want with their own land, especially if we still end up with the exact same acreage and shape between our two houses!?

I read the unified development code and it seems pretty clear that a lot reconfiguration can be done on non-conforming lots, assuming they were legal at the time they were built/created.

Section 40.530.010
Section 40.210.010

Any ideas? Would it be worth it to go through the Lot Reconfiguration process with $1k+ in Administrative fees, plus surveys?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2017, 10:47 AM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
22,647 posts, read 40,010,157 times
Reputation: 23806
I am afraid it will be far more costly than $1k + Admin fees + Survey, but if you plan on staying it may be worth it.
Apparently your seller owns adjacent property. I would FIRST work with them to resolve a proper title / boundary.

Go talk to a land use Attorney that has many SUCCESSFUL petitions before CC Land Use Planning (They are all in bed together, and feather each other VERY well, many have been previous Land Use Planning employees with the county, and existing Land Use County Employees are grooming their future employ in the Attorney / petitioner role). Many are linked with Ex Commissioners turned lucrative Land Developers /and investors.

Be prepared, and do not be "maddened" or combative, as you WILL comply. Or you will not succeed.
Remember your hearings / petitions are not 'real', they are just rubber stamp formalities. (The REAL stuff takes place BEFORE (and after) the hearing in private meetings.)

Choose your battles, for many it is moving out of Clark County.
If you have an ideal place with ideal neighbors it MIGHT be worth the cost and battle. (if you can afford your future taxes and battles)

It will take forever. Get used to it. (I fought it for 25 yrs before I decided to 'comply - do what the insist (as stupid and expensive as it is) keep my trap shut (while in their presence of the presence of their minions).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 10:59 AM
 
2 posts, read 774 times
Reputation: 10
The sellers owned and sold to us 3.6 acres. the title company messed up on the legal description, which created a new tax parcel of only what was described, leaving about 2 acres with the folks I bought the property from. I think they have no idea until they get a tax bill I suppose.

The title mistakes go a couple sales back, so they have re-recorded the deeds properly, so I should be back to where I should be @ 3.6 total within the next week.

My adjacent neighbors on the east side have about .5-.75 acres (guessing) of cleared land. Their parcel is currently about 2 acres total.

So really all we would like to do is remove this piece from their property and add it to ours. We do not want to create a new parcel, and we do not want to build additional houses.

If you take the entire census tract, we end up with <1 house per 5 acres, possibly more as there are many properties with 5-40 acres in our tract.

So simple logic says that it's not our fault our properties are non-conforming... if the R-5 zoning is in place to prevent more than 1 house per 5 acres, and we aren't affecting anything like roads, parking, population density, acres per house, etc, I really don't understand why humans couldn't use logic and reasoning to let other humans do what they want with their own property that they own when it doesn't effect the overall density in our tract.

If it's going to require attorneys and 25 yrs, I might just put this one to bed. I have a very low tolerance for people abusing their power, allowing ego to trump logic, reasoning and common decency.

What was your situation and what did you have to comply with?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2017, 04:37 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
22,647 posts, read 40,010,157 times
Reputation: 23806
I've done many land swaps, boundary line adjustments, re-zones. But don't intend to ever do anymore in Clark County. I have paid my dues
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2016 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Vancouver area
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top