U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Vermont
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-02-2013, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Randolph, VT
72 posts, read 85,296 times
Reputation: 60

Advertisements

As a new resident, I try to keep up with a variety of local news sources (fun to see the same story covered by the Valley News vs. the Argus-Times on the rare occasions they don't just both default to the same national news service).

This post shocked me, and I was curious to see what native/long-term Vermonters had to say about it:
Might as Well Join Canada, We're Already a Colony | Vermont Commons
Quote:
…to sum up, Canada owns 100% of natural gas, 70% of electricity supply, 100% of large dams, 50% of government deposits and 20% of private deposits in Vermont. Freedom and Unity? We should change it to Dependency and Disunity. But as long as we're owned by Canada, can I have their health insurance?
The natural gas scenario I get: VT not inherently a gas producer. Banking is obviously the perfidious clusterlove that it has always been. That VT dams and water resources were owned not just by out-of-staters but by extra-nationals was news to me.

Curious as to whether VTers in general are aware of the overall situation, whether they care, don't care, whether it is truly an active, "live", political issue or just relegated to the carpings of a few cranks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2013, 03:57 AM
 
Location: The Woods
16,936 posts, read 22,202,288 times
Reputation: 9020
Oh boy, you opened a can of worms. It isn't just Canada either, some Arabs have been buying up a lot of motels too. But that Canadian-owned GMP buyout of CVPS is still pretty controversial...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 05:23 AM
 
Location: in a cabin overlooking the mountains
3,079 posts, read 3,708,782 times
Reputation: 2253
To say that CVPS was incompetent would be an understatement. And Vermont is trying to pretend that there is no need to generate electricity. Dirty business doncha know. We don't like nukes because they are scary, we don't like wind cos it's bad for birds, we don't like hydro cos it's bad for fish. So there's nothing left but to let someone else generate it and presto! the electricity comes out of those magic holes in the wall. No fuss no muss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 05:42 AM
 
Location: Live - VT, Work - MA
819 posts, read 1,266,685 times
Reputation: 606
As Frugal pointed out, in VT people like to feel good about being "green" or saving the planet but when you dig a little deeper it is a lot of window dressing and "out of sight out of mind" scenarios.

When you factor in one of the only sizeable "industries" supported by the Vt government. tourism, which is also beholden to the Candians in large part, frankly they drive a large portion of VT, whether it is from tourist dollars or from utility prices. Then again, thsi shouldn't be news to anyone who hasn't been living with their heads in the sand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Somewhere in northern Alabama
17,747 posts, read 53,880,773 times
Reputation: 30011
FWIW, there are NO large dams in Vermont. The closest would be a few on the Connecticut River, which is a smallish river. The St. Johns dams in Canada are huge and were taken by legally stealing native land. IIRC, Bolton Falls dam on the Winooski is a 2 gigawatt unit that can only run part of the time, Waterbury Dam didn't even have generators installed until at least ten years after construction, and so on.

There was debate early on about Vermont's future, which is a large part of why it was an independent country for a short while. From a practical standpoint, the settlers had ties to Connecticut and Boston, it was surrounded on three sides by the U.S., and the eventual outcome was a foregone conclusion.

As for the items mentioned in the article, it missed that until the New England Central, the Central Vermont Railroad was a part of the Canadian rail system, and that much, if not most lumber comes from Canada, and our maple syrup production is a drop in their bucket.

Vermont purposely turned away from industry in the 1930s and has allowed what agriculture there was to die out with the rare exceptions. You live in New England Disneyland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2016 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Vermont
View detailed profiles of:
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top