Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Vermont
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-12-2010, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Western views of Mansfield/Camels Hump!
2,061 posts, read 3,948,272 times
Reputation: 1265

Advertisements

INTO the state (for 5K to 20K moves). Hm. Not sure how scientific this is, of course, but interesting none-the-less.

U-Haul tracking data suggests more families migrating to Kentucky, Vermont than other states — Autoblog
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2010, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
167 posts, read 352,968 times
Reputation: 87
The people on here are always saying everyone is moving out of VT. Now this suggests everyone is moving to VT. I'm confused.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 09:25 AM
 
23,553 posts, read 70,058,150 times
Reputation: 49050
There is an obvious answer. Once a U-Haul makes it to Vermont it breaks down from having to drive up and down the mountains, and is scrapped.

I have used U-Haul vehicles in the past and can say without any reservation that U-Haul is the WORST of the self-move companies. The vehicles are rarely in good repair, their booking system can leave you stranded, and lord help you if you have a problem on the road. Penski, Ryder, ANY of the other companies are far better. ABS will rent a trailer that gets pulled by a professional trucker and ends up being cheaper than most U-Haul moves.

I'm wondering if the U-Haul stats are being skewed by a few people using one-way rentals to move products or materials from various areas into the state from NY and Boston, and trying to avoid the inspections and weigh stations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 12:12 PM
 
118 posts, read 283,931 times
Reputation: 113
Default ,

Vermont Population Change:

Year, International Immigration, Domestic Migration, Net Change

1991, 466, (-550), (-84)
1992, 413, (-433), (-20)
1993, 472, 1,012, 1484
1994, 339, 2,198, 2537
1995, 412, 1,578, 1990
1996, 518, 1,387, 1905
1997, 651, (-18), 633
1998, 760, (-274), 486
1999, 928, 715, 1643
2000, --
2001, 958, 1,050, 2008
2002, 716, 1,471, 2187
2003, 548, 557, 1105
2004, 595, 67, 662
2005, 582, (-556), 26
2006, 616, (-654), (-38)
2007, 538, (-1,767), (-1229)
2008, 528, (-1,703), (-1175)

Source:*U.S. Bureau of Census
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Western views of Mansfield/Camels Hump!
2,061 posts, read 3,948,272 times
Reputation: 1265
The report is for 2009...so maybe the numbers reversed starting then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 01:23 PM
 
159 posts, read 403,440 times
Reputation: 168
The people moving out can no longer afford to rent a U-haul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Pirkanmaa, Finland
121 posts, read 338,692 times
Reputation: 112
The net migration stats and U-Haul usage numbers don't necessarily conflict. I would guess that kids leaving home for college, career, etc. would drive a lot of your outward migration. If they leave home they way most of my friends and I did, it's all in the bed of the pickup and away they go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 01:47 PM
 
118 posts, read 283,931 times
Reputation: 113
If you go to the US Census link below and download the .xls source data for the 2009 state population change estimates you'll find the percentage of change for Vermont was (estimated) a 0.1% increase. This ranks Vermont as the fourth smallest percentage growth for the year. If this is accurate, how Vermont makes U-Hauls list of fastest growing states is anybody's guess.

1. Michigan -0.3
2. Maine -0.1
3. Ohio 0.1
4. Vermont 0.1
5. New Hampshire 0.2
6. Pennsylvania 0.3
7. West Virginia 0.3
8. Connecticut 0.4
9. Mississippi 0.4
10. New York 0.4


US Census 2009 Population Estimates (http://www.census.gov/popest/gallery/maps/numchg-2008-2009.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 02:16 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,337 posts, read 26,398,467 times
Reputation: 11334
Unless it's people moving stuff to their vacation homes I don't think this makes any sense. Maybe we're headed for another invasion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 06:30 PM
 
274 posts, read 672,282 times
Reputation: 206
I moved in, as did 33 people hired by my company from out of state last year. I used a moving company though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Vermont
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top