U.S. Cities  
Merry Christmas!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 11-28-2007, 12:22 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
1 posts, read 759 times
Reputation: 10
dirscherl is on a distinguished road
I have been doing some housing market research and according to the US Census 2.3% of US homeowners pay NO property tax. I am still trying to figure this one out. I am in Spokane and trust me, I feel the pinch. Not only have my property taxes gone through the roof in the last three years, I also get the added bonus of much heavier traffic,tons of gang activity, and schools packed past capacity for the kiddo's. My family first came here in 1880 and I never thought I would want to leave for other lands....sad to contemplate.

On a side note, I have also been researching the Growth Management Act. I wonder if there might be some legal precedent to argue for considering when you bought this property (was is pre 1991?) If so, I would considering digging through this website to see if you could request a hearing from the GMHB. Their website is: Growth Management Hearings Boards - Washington State

Just a thought since rezoning occured and land values did not go down post rezone ( I am assuming)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2007, 01:05 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Columbia Gorge PNW
2,925 posts, read 2,702,719 times
Reputation: 1113
StealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud of
Thanks for the extra avenue to research, I don't qualify for GMHB, because I'm in a special management zone (the only Federal National Scenic area from what I've heard... but it has plenty of problems of it's own, especially now that the counties are administering it)

Some significant loop holes in I-747 will still leave much discretion to the assessor, as
1) the 1% is an aggregate amount, meaning the county can shift and shuffle the tax burden as they see fix, so long as total county tax stays within the 1% cap (if that would be possible)

2) the 1% does not include any voter approved taxes (think 'Super Majority' - ugh...I feel sick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2007, 08:50 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
4,517 posts, read 3,893,098 times
Reputation: 1491
Ultrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud of
Default I just received this info about tomorrows emergency hearing.

The emergency hearing scheduled by the Gov. starts at 8:15 am in Olympia

King County Assessor Scott Noble has repeatedly said reimposing a 1% doesn't fix, in his words, the "crisis", the "catastrophe", the "disaster" that the courts created.

There are over 1700 local governments in Washington. Because of the courts, Rep. Ed Orcutt, ranking minority member of the House Finance Committee, reports that according to the Department of Revenue earlier this week that there's a total of $282.4 million in BANKED CAPACITY -- that's the amount that local governments can increase property taxes without a vote of the people (above the 1%).

Gregoire's bill repeals $23.4 million of that amount, but leaves in place $259 million. So the governor's bill threatens taxpayers with A QUARTER OF A BILLION DOLLAR PROPERTY TAX INCREASE ABOVE HER 1%.

I'm hoping for the best and planning for the worst.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2007, 08:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
205 posts, read 135,313 times
Reputation: 18
stingray427 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultrarunner View Post
The emergency hearing scheduled by the Gov. starts at 8:15 am in Olympia

King County Assessor Scott Noble has repeatedly said reimposing a 1% doesn't fix, in his words, the "crisis", the "catastrophe", the "disaster" that the courts created.

There are over 1700 local governments in Washington. Because of the courts, Rep. Ed Orcutt, ranking minority member of the House Finance Committee, reports that according to the Department of Revenue earlier this week that there's a total of $282.4 million in BANKED CAPACITY -- that's the amount that local governments can increase property taxes without a vote of the people (above the 1%).

Gregoire's bill repeals $23.4 million of that amount, but leaves in place $259 million. So the governor's bill threatens taxpayers with A QUARTER OF A BILLION DOLLAR PROPERTY TAX INCREASE ABOVE HER 1%.

I'm hoping for the best and planning for the worst.
The citizens of Washington need to remove the current government and start over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2007, 12:31 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
801 posts, read 840,209 times
Reputation: 286
Tony1790 is a jewel in the roughTony1790 is a jewel in the roughTony1790 is a jewel in the roughTony1790 is a jewel in the roughTony1790 is a jewel in the roughTony1790 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by stingray427 View Post
The citizens of Washington need to remove the current government and start over.
Gotta love a country that you can lose the election count twice, but can keep on counting until you eventually "win", promise not to raise taxes and then immediately start raising taxes! What a great system that we have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2007, 02:00 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Columbia Gorge PNW
2,925 posts, read 2,702,719 times
Reputation: 1113
StealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud of
If any of you get a good link to describe the current news on this let us know. (Those of us who live in the news shadow of PDX,) I did hear that they made progress on this today, and have a relief provision for those with incomes less than $57k/ yr. (that may help, I hope...)

But... with the previously 'banked' $$ I don't see a breather in this. The REP web site mentions that the non-elected governor was feeling pressure from the right to do this. And as they mentioned she certainly hasn't been one to curtail "BIG" spending... Washington State Republican Party :: News Item - Gregoire Changes I-747 Stance Under Pressure from Rossi

If its politics, its propaganda...(regardless of who's side is whining) and some think we live in a democracy ... But there are whole government infrastructures to support that she created in her previous positions. (she must really like the fluff that CARB will create, it may even dwarf her Clean Air empire). As we know, government doesn't get smaller or more efficient.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2007, 04:15 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
205 posts, read 135,313 times
Reputation: 18
stingray427 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony1790 View Post
Gotta love a country that you can lose the election count twice, but can keep on counting until you eventually "win", promise not to raise taxes and then immediately start raising taxes! What a great system that we have.
sounds like communism government controls everything and not really a free country here. iRS is gestapo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2007, 10:38 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: WA
2,285 posts, read 2,872,760 times
Reputation: 683
cdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to behold
The news this morning is that I-747 has been reinstated so that we are back to increases being capped to 1% annually. It would be interesting to see the details and if this can be rolled back as easy as it was reinstated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2007, 12:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Columbia Gorge PNW
2,925 posts, read 2,702,719 times
Reputation: 1113
StealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud of
here is a bit of discussion regarding yesterday's action. I've yet to see the official details
Sound Politics: One percent tax cap passes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2007, 05:15 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
4,517 posts, read 3,893,098 times
Reputation: 1491
Ultrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud ofUltrarunner has much to be proud of
Default Home Owners have been granted some relief.

When I started this post it was because my assessment increased 80%. My assessment is still 80% higher than last years.

At the same time, prop I-747 was thrown out by the WA Supreme Court. (I-747 limited Statewide Property Tax Increases to 1%)

The good news is that the 1% cap has been reinstated... due, in large part, to voter outrage.

It is good news and I am pleased the legislature stepped in. Home owners, as a group, have been granted some relief.

On the downside, taxing districts that have been "Banking" tax increase authority still have the right to implement all "Banked" taxes.

Also, the Assessor is still free to increase property assessments to whatever he believes the property to be worth.

The 1% cap is good, however, individual property taxes are still subject to dramatic increases based on "Banked" taxing authority and assessment increases determined solely by the Assessor's Office.

Thank You to everyone that helped make the 1% cap a reality...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top