Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-13-2017, 05:14 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,091,022 times
Reputation: 11535

Advertisements

I spoke with a car dealer yesterday who thought that there was going to be a change in Washington in the next few years to add state income tax. I imagine you folks think about that so I thought that I would ask your options on what you hear.

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2017, 05:23 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57739
They have tried before and the effort always fails, but who knows what the future holds? The lack of income tax is the reason for high property, sales, gas, and Business & Occupation taxes. The state will get their money one way or another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 10:34 AM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,690 posts, read 57,994,855 times
Reputation: 46171
WA is becoming populated with Sympathetic electorate.

Only a matter of time, for a significant restructure of taxation (hint:will be MORE, but be sold as 'fair'.

WA is not currently a 'low-tax-state'. Burden is adequate, but will become heavy as it morphs to Oregon / California status. (These states all try to be similar in Regs and services. There is much collusion within the state politics. There is a lot of immigration between the left coast states, and they will succumb to the same (low) level of concern for tax payers, land owners, and job creators

SD and WY will be the last 'no income tax' states to fall. (They have a diverse electorate, but strong presence of land owners / job creators / State economic contributors /farmers /ranchers, unlike WA which has renters and 'employees' / TAKERS / who are thoughtless as to the implications of their vote). SD domicile is very ez... one overnight stay per lifetime, no need to return to SD, just don't trigger domicile elsewhere. Varies by state. Some 188 days, some property ownership, some 'employment' ....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Northwest Peninsula
6,223 posts, read 3,404,518 times
Reputation: 4367
The common cry of a state income supporters is it would eliminate or reduce the sale tax/property tax....sure it will just like it has in California....The hourly working man around the state, even in the I-5 Corridor, will not support this leftist Californian boondoggle.
Just promise the weak minded of lowering the sale tax/property and they will vote for it and a year or two another crisis will come up and those tax will raise up again and again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,091,022 times
Reputation: 11535
The entitlement that the franchise tax board in CA is second to none. They will do everything to make your life horrible if they don't get their money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 11:24 PM
 
Location: WA Desert, Seattle native
9,398 posts, read 8,863,546 times
Reputation: 8812
I don't think a WA income tax will come anytime soon. While Seattle tends to be somewhat favorable to such a plan, anywhere outside the city would likely result in a rebellion.

I honestly believe many move here because of the lack of an income tax. And businesses move here for the same reason, though their B&O taxes still are high.

To blow up a tax system in one of the fastest growing States in the country seems to me to be counter-productive. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Oh btw, what other fast growing States have no income tax? Try Texas and Florida for starters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 06:10 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,702,895 times
Reputation: 12943
The state always votes it down but when people moving here go out of their way to - oh, buy a car in AK to avoid paying sales taxes - it puts the state infrastructure costs on a smaller portion of the state population, motivating the state to look at ways to make up those costs, especially when our state is growing at the ridiculous rate it is.

Last edited by Seacove; 01-14-2017 at 06:37 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 06:15 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,091,022 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
The state always votes it down but when people moving here go out of their way to - oh, buy a car in AK to avoid paying sales taxes - it puts the state infrastructure costs on a smaller portion of the state population, motivating the state to look at ways to make up those costs, especially when our state is growing at the ridiculous rate it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Independent Republic of Ballard
8,067 posts, read 8,358,268 times
Reputation: 6228
A minimal income tax on high earners ($1M+?) could adequately fund satisfying the McCleary decision. One reason we're importing tons of tech talent is that we've failed to produce that talent here due to under-funding our educational system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 02:47 PM
 
Location: West Coast
1,889 posts, read 2,198,110 times
Reputation: 4345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
The state always votes it down but when people moving here go out of their way to - oh, buy a car in AK to avoid paying sales taxes - it puts the state infrastructure costs on a smaller portion of the state population, motivating the state to look at ways to make up those costs, especially when our state is growing at the ridiculous rate it is.
God forbid they learn to live within a budget like everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top