|

06-28-2008, 01:26 PM
|
|
Keep It Simple
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
3,761 posts, read 1,951,503 times
Reputation: 639
|
|
|
One word - Awesome!
|
|

06-28-2008, 05:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Naval Station Guam
56 posts, read 52,178 times
Reputation: 59
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeronikaW
I was on the 18 today driving from Federal Way to Issaquah, and my goodness the mountain looked amazing!! It was breathtaking!!
V. =)
|
Ok, I have to help you out here. If you go to Washington and say "I was on the 18," everyone will know you're from California. You have to say "I was on 18," or "I was on hwy 18," with no "the."
Hearing "the I-5" or "the 405" is a dead giveaway. Native Washingtonians sometimes roll their eyes at Californian arrivals (in a good-natured way, of course) so you'll have to work on your "passing" skills 
|
|

06-29-2008, 02:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seattle area, via Phoenix, San Jose and Orange County
1,077 posts, read 1,049,393 times
Reputation: 262
|
|
Off topic, but putting "the" in front of a highway number is more of a Southern Californian thing, from what I've observed.
Norcal folks tend not to do that. They'll say that "traffic on 880 is horrible this morning," for example.
Nobody says "the I-5," though. In Los Angeles, it would simply be "the 5" or "the Santa Ana."
Quote:
Originally Posted by team_evans
Hearing "the I-5" or "the 405" is a dead giveaway. Native Washingtonians sometimes roll their eyes at Californian arrivals (in a good-natured way, of course) so you'll have to work on your "passing" skills 
|
|
|

06-29-2008, 03:09 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seattle Area
1,631 posts, read 1,156,622 times
Reputation: 896
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelinWA
Off topic, but putting "the" in front of a highway number is more of a Southern Californian thing, from what I've observed.
Norcal folks tend not to do that. They'll say that "traffic on 880 is horrible this morning," for example.
Nobody says "the I-5," though. In Los Angeles, it would simply be "the 5" or "the Santa Ana."
|
I have noticed that too. I have cousins in Southern CA, and in Northern, CA and they tell me the same thing...
|
|

06-30-2008, 03:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Duluth, MN
135 posts, read 108,641 times
Reputation: 80
|
|
I know the NPS ranger at Mt. Rainier NP who does most of their ski instruction - lots of cross country with an emphasis on back country and telemark skills. Guy gets paid to ski - I hate him  .
I was at the wind farm in Ellensburg last Thursday and could see both Mt. Rainier and Mt. Baker at the same time, which was pretty cool. It's also nice to see Rainier as you drive along East Lake Sammamish Parkway into Issaquah (note: not " the East Lake Sammamish Parkway"...  ).
|
|

06-30-2008, 08:19 PM
|
|
Proud California Native
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over CA (north and south), now in the Seattle area...
855 posts, read 867,704 times
Reputation: 195
|
|
|
Yep definitely a SoCal thing, when I moved to NoCal, they told me that was a dead give away that I wasn't from there.
V. =)
|
|

06-30-2008, 11:54 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In the evergreens
818 posts, read 554,239 times
Reputation: 613
|
|
|
If you do decide to go up I suggest late summer or early fall after all the snow has melted, except the glaciers of course. I was up there a few days ago and even at Paradise which is only 5400' in elevation there was a lot of snow on the ground. You couldn't hike any trails. Pick a nice clear day in August or September, there are usually quite a few at that time, and head on up. The trails will be clear then and you can take nice hikes around at that time.
|
|

07-01-2008, 09:32 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
2,336 posts, read 1,735,137 times
Reputation: 944
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beenaroundabit
I was at the wind farm in Ellensburg last Thursday and could see both Mt. Rainier and Mt. Baker at the same time, which was pretty cool.  ).
|
Are you sure you weren't seeing Glacier Peak? It's between where you were and Mount Baker.
|
|

07-01-2008, 09:50 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
2,336 posts, read 1,735,137 times
Reputation: 944
|
|
|
If you go to Mt. Rainier in the summer time, take a day off work and go on a weekday. Or leave Seattle early enough to get to the park entrance by 9:00 if you are going on a weekend or holiday.
Take your time to walk the nature trails and to learn about how the mountain got there, how people have enjoyed and used it over the years, and how the mountain is always changing. And also how catastrophic those changes can be. The park is still recovering from and mitigating the damage from the torrential rains that came a couple of years ago.
Remember that Mount Rainier isn't a theme park. You will be standing on the slope of a barely-dormant volcano that is geologically unstable. As a tourist destination it is unsurpassed in our area, though, and you could spend a lifetime exploring the mountain.
There is a book called "Measure of a Mountain" that came out about ten years ago that is a pretty good introduction. Read the book before you go, and you'll see the mountain in a whole different and knowing way.
|
|

07-02-2008, 08:59 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Duluth, MN
135 posts, read 108,641 times
Reputation: 80
|
|
Quote:
|
Are you sure you weren't seeing Glacier Peak? It's between where you were and Mount Baker.
|
It very well could have been; thanks for the clarification (I am easily confused - obviously  ).
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|