I just filed for unemloyment last week in Seattle after about a year and a half of on again-off again working.
In order to qualify you must have worked at least 680 hours
in your base year. The determination of 'base year' is a Venusian calculation with no connection to any current reality.
Lucky for you, I have a letter from them with my claim which lists the base year calculation on the back:
"the base year is a 12 month period consisting of the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters before the date that you filed your application for benefits". (see chart)
If you file in Sept 2009 your base year will begin Jan, Feb, March
2008, and then the following four quarters, Savvy? So your base year is actually
last year. Not this year.
However, if you fail to fulfill the 680 hours in that base year, you can go back and request
different base year be used. *sigh* Hopefully a base year in which you worked the requisite 680 hours.....
On Saturday I got 2 letters from the unemployment office. One of them gaveth and the other tooketh tooketh away. The first letter was a determination of my monthly stipend and the second letter was a denial of the claim due to my being short of the 680 in the base year. So I called them and we used a different base year, and my claim was accepted.
Good luck.
