Quote:
Originally Posted by gallo
...I just wanted to clarify that I don't want to shoot Vancouver or Olympia.
What I meant to say was I'd shoot FOR Vancouver/Portland or Olympia. ...
Don't want to start any conspiracy theories here. LOL.
|
feel free to shoot our tax assessors / board of equalization

/ elected officials (failed promises?

)) and the judges who've rejected the initiative to cap taxes
BTW; I'm still looking for an affordable place to 'retire'. Low expenses are more important than low capital investment. Paying twice as much for taxes as house payment would indicate a rusty, 'leaky bucket'. (and no way to patch). 10+ yrs to senior deferral age for me, and by then the assessor will be living in my house. (he offers to buy it every year.... ). National Scenic area restrictions won't allow me to convert it to one of the many 'tax deferred' uses.
For the OP... just look into each area, and especially the diversity of employment and benefits. Quantify the tax burden, and needs for future services (education, entertainment, healthcare, regional transportation).
Be cautious of Olympia, that's where all the legislators hang out... you don't want to get into gallo's 'cross-fire'

My percieved downside of Oly, would be 'cabin fever', surrounded by WA, and lots of people (traffic + smog). It is a hike to a pretty (and accessible) coast, and mountains are limited. But, The Olympics are pretty nice! There are nice spots in each location, and adequate rain

. Vancouver does have the advantage of shopping in OR (no sales tax), and possibly the advantage of NO WA NEWS (all news is from Oregon, they have some interesting legislative battles.)