Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: ....
A 14 33.33%
B 0 0%
C 0 0%
D 1 2.38%
E 0 0%
F 27 64.29%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-25-2011, 06:51 PM
 
Location: New York City
2,745 posts, read 6,461,068 times
Reputation: 1890

Advertisements

In a few hundred million years, the Earth may become very similar to Venus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-25-2011, 06:53 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,443,154 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by deneb78 View Post
My understanding is that carbon dioxide is a colourless and odourless gas at any concentration but I could be wrong on that.
Found this off wikipedia:

At low concentrations, the gas is odorless. At higher concentrations it has a sharp, acidic odor. It can cause asphyxiation and irritation. When inhaled at concentrations much higher than usual atmospheric levels, it can produce a sour taste in the mouth and a stinging sensation in the nose and throat. These effects result from the gas dissolving in the mucous membranes and saliva, forming a weak solution of carbonic acid. This sensation can also occur during an attempt to stifle a burp after drinking a carbonated beverage. Amounts above 5,000 ppm are considered very unhealthy, and those above about 50,000 ppm (equal to 5% by volume) are considered dangerous to animal life.

Someone I met who does research earth sciences said that if we burned all the fossil fuels (known?) the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration would be 2000 ppm or 0.2% by volume.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2011, 06:56 PM
 
Location: In transition
10,635 posts, read 16,690,365 times
Reputation: 5248
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Found this off wikipedia:

At low concentrations, the gas is odorless. At higher concentrations it has a sharp, acidic odor. It can cause asphyxiation and irritation. When inhaled at concentrations much higher than usual atmospheric levels, it can produce a sour taste in the mouth and a stinging sensation in the nose and throat. These effects result from the gas dissolving in the mucous membranes and saliva, forming a weak solution of carbonic acid. This sensation can also occur during an attempt to stifle a burp after drinking a carbonated beverage. Amounts above 5,000 ppm are considered very unhealthy, and those above about 50,000 ppm (equal to 5% by volume) are considered dangerous to animal life.

Someone I met who does research earth sciences said that if we burned all the fossil fuels (known?) the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration would be 2000 ppm or 0.2% by volume.
Interesting... didn't know that I imagine though that with the concentration of Carbon Dioxide in the Venusian atmosphere, a sour taste in the mouth is the last thing one needs to worry about
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2011, 06:56 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,443,154 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by deneb78 View Post
I In my current human form, I'll have to give this climate an F but if I was some other alien or robot that could handle such conditions, I'd give it an A.˙.
Venus isn't very good for electronics. No instruments or robots we can build can survive for more than an hour. Otherwise we could send probes there like we did for Mars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2011, 06:58 PM
 
Location: In transition
10,635 posts, read 16,690,365 times
Reputation: 5248
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Venus isn't very good for electronics. No instruments or robots we can build can survive for more than an hour. Otherwise we could send probes there like we did for Mars.
The last probe that landed at Venus was in the 70s. I'm with sure with today's technology we could make electronics resistant but it would probably be very costly and not all that practical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2011, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Yorkshire, England
5,586 posts, read 10,646,386 times
Reputation: 3106
Quote:
Originally Posted by deneb78 View Post
The last probe that landed at Venus was in the 70s. I'm with sure with today's technology we could make electronics resistant but it would probably be very costly and not all that practical.
With Venus being as bad as it is it's pretty ironic that even only 50 years ago top scientists genuinely believed it could be more or less a substitute for Earth. It'd be quite interesting to see a simulation of what would actually happen to us/anything on the surface over there. And by the looks of it we've got five volunteers for a manned mission
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2011, 12:14 AM
 
Location: Seattle, Washington
3,721 posts, read 7,821,487 times
Reputation: 2029
F!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2011, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Buxton, England
6,990 posts, read 11,408,010 times
Reputation: 3672
Whoever voted A has severe brain damage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 01:51 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,383,744 times
Reputation: 1387
It is certainly warmer there than eg in my hometown but still, no, it is not any A for me...

Seriously, if the Hell exists, it must be on Venus. Mars looks like a nice, continetal climate compared to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 09:02 PM
 
3,212 posts, read 3,172,756 times
Reputation: 1067
The only climate on here that I'd give an F to for being too hot. Maybe L.A-Mex might enjoy it though? No microclimate in our metro area can touch the blistering temperatures of even the coldest part of Venus at any time of the year.

Last edited by ABrandNewWorld; 02-26-2015 at 09:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top