Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Dayum. Snow cover is still 100% here and I measured it at 7 inches earlier (lying snow, not drifts). It didn't even seem that deep but my 6" long measuring equipment was totally buried inside the snow when it reached the ground. Terrible! It may still be like this in April. Time's running out.
If it wasn't so windy during last weekend's snow event we'd probably have closer to 100% snow cover, but it drifted too much and many areas were left exposed with hardly any cover. I'm surprised the snow has lasted as long as it has though considering we're at a low elevation (relatively speaking).
Yes that happened here below 200m. Thats why I hate drifting. People on here praise it and Im thinking NO because the cover will be uneven and not last.
If it was in January, it'd be absolutely fine, I managed to keep 100% snow cover back in Jan even with one day reaching 4C under sunshine, but in March, for snow to last, it needs to be overcast. Either way, this snow event here was only made memorable due to 2 factors - it's late March, and drifting. I have never seen drifting like this in Leeds.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
