Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
there are almost no large cities in the US and Canada (San Francisco probably the only one) that have cooler and cloudier summer weather than the entire England (where London is the warmest place), so your argument is invalid.
Who cares? What does that have to do with this discussion??
Quit trolling about the UK constantly, it is beyond pathetic...
And you live in the city with one of the most rubbish climates in the entire USA, so your point is?
there are almost no large cities in the US and Canada (San Francisco probably the only one) that have cooler and cloudier summer weather than the entire England (where London is the warmest place), so your argument is invalid.
Huh? How on earth does that have anything to do with my arguement being invalid?
Why is it "trolling" to say that london has a bad climate? Get this through your heads! London has a bad climate. Miami has a bad climate. Alaska has a bad climate. Singapore has a bad climate. San francisco has a bad climate.
Why is it "trolling" to state a opinion based on the standard climatic preferances of most people?
God this is rediculous... Most of us who live in poor climates dont freak out when someone comments on its shortcomings!
This stupid London **** needs to stop
It's trolling when you purposefully ignore actual stats or make up stats though, such as claiming a weather station in London that recorded 80f doesn't count, because it's not Heathrow or isn't on some random US site with inaccurate data anyway. Then when Heathrow is warmest, they claim its part of the UHI so it doesn't count, even though it isn't part of the UHI.
It's funny when it comes from someone who lives in Seattle, which has the same average temperature in summer as the outer London stations.
Why is it "trolling" to say that london has a bad climate? Get this through your heads! London has a bad climate. Miami has a bad climate. Alaska has a bad climate. Singapore has a bad climate. San francisco has a bad climate.
Why is it "trolling" to state a opinion based on the standard climatic preferances of most people?
God this is rediculous... Most of us who live in poor climates dont freak out when someone comments on its shortcomings!
This stupid London **** needs to stop
Because this particular user brings out his hate for the UK in dozens & dozens & dozens of threads & even when it has nothing to do with the discussion. He is beyond obsessed, that is why it is trolling & not just having an opinion...
no. When someone posted averages from another station that said London receives 1400 hours of sunshine, you got mad and said it doesn't count because Heathrow gets more than 1600 hours.
You seem to be very like wavehunter, always looking to criticise the UK climate
The site that records 1400 hours of sunshine - Greenwich - is obscured - when all other stations in London record 1550-1650 hours of sunshine, it doesn't take a genius to realise that Greenwich is an anomaly.
I don't see why this thread has caused up such a fuss.. Kew Gardens IS in London, it IS an official Met Office station, it is actually closer to the centre of London than Heathrow.. so what is the issue? London therefore HAS recorded 80f this year
This guy is even trying to tell me that Heathrow is the most representative climate for London, despite the fact that he is thousands of miles away and I live a 5 minute drive away from Heathrow If you want an accurate representation of the climate of actual London city itself, where the tourists and millions of people work everyday, look at London WC, not some airport 20 miles out west in the suburbs that is surrounded by lakes and fields.
You seem to be very like wavehunter, always looking to criticise the UK climate
The site that records 1400 hours of sunshine - Greenwich - is obscured - when all other stations in London record 1600-1650 hours of sunshine, it doesn't take a genius to realise that Greenwich is an anomaly.
I don't see why this thread has caused up such a fuss.. Kew Gardens IS in London, it IS an official Met Office station, it is actually closer to the centre of London than Heathrow.. so what is the issue? London therefore HAS recorded 80f this year
Well. By that logic the Kew Gardens reading is an anomoly and should be ignored!
Why is it "trolling" to say that london has a bad climate? Get this through your heads! London has a bad climate. Miami has a bad climate. Alaska has a bad climate. Singapore has a bad climate. San francisco has a bad climate.
Why is it "trolling" to state a opinion based on the standard climatic preferances of most people?
God this is rediculous... Most of us who live in poor climates dont freak out when someone comments on its shortcomings!
This stupid London **** needs to stop
Nobody is arguing that London has a bad climate - I would agree with that actually, it does, even though it is a hell of a lot better than many places including a large majority of US cities that get freezing winters.
But it is obvious trolling when the poster uses incorrect data, tries to claim a knowledge of an area where he has never lived. Why do you think that he used the incorrect Greenwich sunshine hours to claim that London gets 1400 hours, yet he earlier said that we should stick to one station - Heathrow, that records 1630?
I agree, I wish this London crap would end as it is pretty boring, but trolls need to stop for that to happen.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.