Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2016, 08:31 PM
 
29,522 posts, read 19,616,477 times
Reputation: 4542

Advertisements

Areas that have seen the most warming are the high latitudes of the Arctic. Twice the rate elsewhere. Is that co2? Ocean cycles? The sun? Or a combination? It seems that the evidence is mounting that carbon dioxide plays a major role in regulating the earth's climate over long periods.


Richard Alley is excellent in explaining this. Watch

https://youtu.be/RffPSrRpq_g
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2016, 08:46 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,064 posts, read 17,006,525 times
Reputation: 30213
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
Areas that have seen the most warming are the high latitudes of the Arctic. Twice the rate elsewhere. Is that co2? Ocean cycles? The sun? Or a combination? It seems that the evidence is mounting that carbon dioxide plays a major role in regulating the earth's climate over long periods.


Richard Alley is excellent in explaining this. Watch

https://youtu.be/RffPSrRpq_g
If it is true it's probably because the Ice Age is only now ending there. I personally suspect some of the data and earlier "cooler" temperatures. While a novel is no direct factual authority, novels about the Arctic such as Farley Mowat's Lost in the Barrens, written during the 1950's or early 1960's highlighted a warm spell in December that nearly ended tragically for the story's main characters. They were lured out of safe quarters to make a dash for the southland and of course winter's return overtook them.

That proves nothing directly except that the author was drawing from his own Arctic experiences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2016, 08:47 PM
 
Location: Norman, OK
2,850 posts, read 1,970,576 times
Reputation: 892
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
This is Chicago's temperature trend according to Berkeley Earth. My question is how did they get data for the 1700's when no station or settlement existed?
They estimated it using stations over 1,000 km away. That's why there's significant uncertainty for that time period.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
There are factors such as Urban Heat Island that could account for the minor amount of warming that has occurred. One degree Fahrenheit in a century, or about 0.4 C, is hardly an emergency and is likely within natural fluctuation range.
Not always.
Check out Barrow, AK.


Also, the globe has warmed 1 degree Fahrenheit in the past 40 years, not the past 100. While you could probably find some time in the past where that's happened, the biggest problem will be if the trend continues. We're likely not more than another degree F or two away from the warmest time in this interglacial. There's even the possibility that this is the warmest time in the present interglacial.

Paleoclimate: The End of the Holocene « RealClimate
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...Variations.png
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2016, 08:53 PM
 
29,522 posts, read 19,616,477 times
Reputation: 4542
Quote:
Originally Posted by srfoskey View Post
They estimated it using stations over 1,000 km away. That's why there's significant uncertainty for that time period.

Are you certain of this? Is this stated by Berkeley Earth? If that's the case, that would be ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2016, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
143 posts, read 158,738 times
Reputation: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Here's Moscow, just January
Oh wow, average Jan temp of -20... no wonder Nazi German was frozen in it's tracks... what are the chances!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2016, 10:49 PM
 
2,441 posts, read 2,608,562 times
Reputation: 4644
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamingGalah! View Post



(gif)
You, sir, are no galah.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2016, 01:01 AM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,655 posts, read 12,953,701 times
Reputation: 6391
Sydney's winters have warmed up by a relatively great degree since the 1800s. Check out the difference in its winters between the 1880s and 2010s normals in this thread:

Rate the climate: Sydney (1881-1910 normals)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2016, 03:05 AM
 
Location: Trondheim, Norway - 63 N
3,600 posts, read 2,692,325 times
Reputation: 1872
There is no doubth that the climate have become warmer, and there is scientific agreement that increased CO2 in the atmosphere is the main reason, and there is no dispute in the scientific community that it is getting warmer. There is some uncertainty about how much it is going to warm. There is agreement that the rate of warming is going to increase, so it will warm faster in the future than it has by now.
Nature is reacting to it. Mackerell is now common up in the Arctic, never seen before. The permafrost in the ground on Svalbard is getting warmer.
Glaciers are shrinking, especially on Greenland.
Heat records are happening all the time, while cold records have become rare.

Here is annual temperature at Utsira back to 1868, a lighthouse on island off the SW coast of Norway, so far from the Arctic. No UHI whatsoever here. Variability from year to year, but the trend is clearly upward:


And here is Vardø, a small town on a windblown island in the Barents Sea, far NE of Norway. UHI must be very weak here. Trend is clearly seen:

Credit: http://www.rimfrost.no/

Last edited by Jakobsli; 07-17-2016 at 03:17 AM.. Reason: Credit image
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2016, 03:42 AM
 
Location: Leeds, UK
22,112 posts, read 29,585,134 times
Reputation: 8819
For the Central England Temperature area, the weather stations are not affected by UHI. That is very much intentional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2016, 04:11 AM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,516 posts, read 75,307,397 times
Reputation: 16619
CO2 levels must of melted the mile thick ice covering Chicago 20,000 years ago


I promised myself not to contribute to this thread with some Ludacris comments. So have fun everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top