Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-13-2017, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Laurentia
5,576 posts, read 7,995,214 times
Reputation: 2446

Advertisements

Presumably the seasons would be more extreme with I'm guessing about double the annual variation we see today. The equator would see much higher sun angles at equinoxes than the solstices, so the double peak of insolation they receive today that is a mere curiosity would have a noticeable impact on tropical climate. The tropics would be cooler at solstices and hotter at equinoxes. Four-season climates would extend to much lower latitudes as would the winter snowpack, and higher latitudes would see warmer summers, likely substantially shrinking the permanent ice cap. On the other hand winter ice and snow extent would of course be much larger. Stronger autumn and spring storms are much more likely due to the higher temperature gradient available for them to tap into - Uranus, which has extreme obliquity, has been observed to do this.

Hotter summers would also raise water temperatures (and lower wind shear in the summer) at higher latitudes enabling hurricanes to travel much further north in the summer and autumn. The lowest latitudes of the hurricane belt may also see increased tropical cyclone activity near the equinoxes, particularly the autumn equinox, which is when tropical and temperate waters will both be at their (now much hotter) annual maximum. The spring equinox will see far more wind shear from the spring mid-latitude storms than today even in the deep tropics so while there would likely be be a "second season" its hurricane activity would be limited.

With regards to the sun angle, the arctic circle is now at 50 degrees rather than 67 degrees, which means that most of Canada and northern Europe experience the midnight sun in summer and the polar night in winter. Above 56 degrees will be civil polar night, where it's still night (as opposed to twilight) at midday on the winter solstice. Above 62 degrees nautical polar night is experienced, where on the winter solstice even at midday on the winter solstice there is no trace of daylight.

The tropics, on the other hand, now extend up to 40 degrees latitude, which means at the 40th parallel the sun is now directly overhead at the summer solstice. In the lower midlatitudes the noon sun will pass overhead in early summer, appear north of the zenith in midsummer, and then move back southward. In Chicago (40N) the sun would appear directly overhead on the summer solstice and the day would be 18 hours long, whereas on the winter solstice day would be 6 hours long and the sun would appear as low in the sky as it does in present-day Scotland.

At the equator the noon sun will be directly overhead at equinoxes and appear only 50 degrees up at the solstices - this is similar to the winter sun angle at Florida's latitude, so it's likely even the equator will have noticeable, if minor, seasonality in temperatures. Insolation will overall be a bit lower than today at the equator, so average temperatures will drop a few degrees, probably rising and falling about 10 degrees from the annual average between the two winters and the two summers. I'm guessing this because Florida cools 20 degrees or so over twice as long of a season. So instead of a constant 90 degrees at the equator a typical climate there will probably vary between 80 near the solstices and 90 near the equinoxes.

Last edited by Patricius Maximus; 11-13-2017 at 10:25 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2017, 09:31 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,447,987 times
Reputation: 15179
since at high latitudes, the bulk of sunlight comes in the high sun half of the year; so overall the annual average temperature would increase above 40°N or so. 10° or 20° sun barely does any warming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2017, 02:22 PM
 
Location: 64'N Umeå, Sweden - The least bad Dfc
2,155 posts, read 1,539,968 times
Reputation: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackierudetsky View Post
How do sun angles work?
The higher the sun is in the sky, the higher the sun angle is. If the sun is 30 degrees off the horizon, the sun angle is 30 degrees. The sun angle is not only the angle of the sun off the horizon, but it is also, believe it or not, the angle that the sun's rays hit the ground. Such an amazing coincidence. Really makes you wonder, don't you think? 🤔
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 09:47 PM
 
378 posts, read 418,403 times
Reputation: 74
If it was tilted more, even more parts of Europe would get 24 hours of daylight and darkness. USA could see the sun and moon at zenith.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 09:50 PM
 
378 posts, read 418,403 times
Reputation: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackierudetsky View Post
How about if the world were tilted at 10 degrees instead of at 23.44 degrees like the way it currently is?
Seasons would have a little change, not drastically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 11:22 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,447,987 times
Reputation: 15179
I calculated the radiation fluxes the earth would get if the earth's tilt was at 45°. x-axis is months past winter solstice [so 6 = June 21]. Y-axis is W/m^2. You can see the high latitudes get lots of sunshine in the spring / summer



I'd imagine monsoonal influences, hurricanes could reach the high latitudes. And enough heat for northern oceans to really heat up. If you added the area under the cover, you'd find over the year, each latitude gets about the same amount of solar radiation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 08:37 PM
 
378 posts, read 418,403 times
Reputation: 74
And of top of that if it was tilted at 90 degrees, one pole would experience complete darkness and extremely cold, and the other hot and with 24 hour sunlight directly overhead. The best would be close to the equator, so you don't freeze or burn to death.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 09:57 PM
 
Location: Crook County, Hellinois
5,820 posts, read 3,870,206 times
Reputation: 8123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slay The Great View Post
And of top of that if it was tilted at 90 degrees, one pole would experience complete darkness and extremely cold, and the other hot and with 24 hour sunlight directly overhead. The best would be close to the equator, so you don't freeze or burn to death.
No, it wouldn't. With a 90-degree tilt, the sun at the equator would hover near the horizon for most of the year, with short periods of normal day/night cycles every spring and fall. With such a low sun angle, the equatorial region would be unpleasantly cold for most of the year, similar to Siberia or Alaska on "normal" Earth.

Your best bet would be to live along the Earth's Tropics. Its climate would be similar to Scandinavia: cold but not horribly cold, with just enough warm months to make it bearable. There'd also be 24-hour darkness and midnight sun to match, with each period not being excessively long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2017, 07:28 AM
 
1,284 posts, read 1,010,598 times
Reputation: 359
Wouldn't the entire world be continental?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2017, 08:14 AM
 
1,284 posts, read 1,010,598 times
Reputation: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillennialUrbanist View Post
Your best bet would be to live along the Earth's Tropics. Its climate would be similar to Scandinavia: cold but not horribly cold, with just enough warm months to make it bearable. There'd also be 24-hour darkness and midnight sun to match, with each period not being excessively long.
Don't you mean subtropics?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top