|
The problem with this technology is they aren't able to explain it to scientists in a way it doesn't conflict with established laws of thermodynamics/whatnot. Science won't endorse what it can't explain for fear of being ridiculed, and so people like stanley meyer are made the butt of a joke instead of giving it a chance for real.
Something working is enough evidence IMO, even if it is hobbled together with multiple pre established technologies like electrolysis. Now, the second ingredient making the water 'burn'- how often does it need replacement? How much will that translate to in terms of operational cost over long term? Those are honest questions we should pose all versions of technology rising to solve our collective energy problems. Some will be less than cost effective, others will be more suitable for general purpose, and expecting miraculous results is unrealistic. The more we support and encourage those (individuals and corporations) making these efforts, the sooner we'll have something available in the marketplace.
|
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. 
Linear Mode
