U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Old 10-09-2010, 06:38 PM
DBT DBT started this thread
2 posts, read 6,943 times
Reputation: 11


The Notice of Determination stated I was ruled both eligible under Section 402(b) and ineligible under Section 401(d)(1) for benefits causing me overall to be ineligible for benefits.

I sent an appeal letter against the ineligible Section 401(d)(1). The Notice of Hearing received lists Specific Issues to be covered in the appeal Section 402(b),Section 401(d)(1),(2) and Other Issues tht may be considered Section 402(e) and Section 3 by the Referee.

I read the following laws, and thought the Appeal Hearing could only cover the ineligible Section 401(d)(1).

This regulation requires that the evidence adduced and the determination made at the referee’s hearing be limited to the legal issue ruled on by the Bureau in its notification of ineligibility for benefits. Corressel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 385 A.2d 615 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1978).
The evidence adduced at the referee’s hearing must be limited to the reasons stated in the notice of ineligibility given to the claimant by the Bureau. Bilsing v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 382 A.2d 1279 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1978).

Is this correct? Can the Referee introduce additional issues beyond the Section I was appealing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 10-09-2010, 07:17 PM
Location: Wisconsin
20,226 posts, read 39,344,130 times
Reputation: 13251
Your question is better posted here:


which forum deals with lots of unemployment hearing issues.

From what I have read, the claimant is pretty much at the mercy of the hearing examiner in all states. You may need to appeal more than once.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top