U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 02-23-2012, 09:13 PM
 
16,980 posts, read 7,610,854 times
Reputation: 6293

Advertisements

seain dublin, Years ago, offices were overstaffed. Managers had secretaries whose true function was to make them feel important as they had direct staff. Today, with offices lean, and most likely filling dozen of spots annually, 2 letters of rejection times dozens is time not available.as the secretary who had nothing to do 90% of the time has been eliminated.

PLus, if corps sent out rejections, those cut before the final round would feel entitled too. Now we are up to 97 letters/emails per opening.

Just not a prudent use of time. I'm glad the OP got closure, but its not possible to provide that with the lean staffing levels necessary today.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2012, 10:04 PM
 
6,370 posts, read 10,456,897 times
Reputation: 4119
In my industry you get a FedEx'd letter if you didn't make it, otherwise you get a phone call if you did.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2012, 06:50 AM
 
5,318 posts, read 5,575,393 times
Reputation: 5387
Sometimes they screw up the rejection letters. I had a scheduled on-site interview and got a generic reject email the day prior. I quickly called the HR person to confirm the interview and discuss the rejection email.

I was told to ignore the letter - they just filled the original position I had applied for, but there was another similar position they were interviewing me for.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2012, 09:29 AM
 
58 posts, read 13,260 times
Reputation: 53
A rejection letter in my opinion is a nice touch.

Do you honestly want someone to call you just to tell you thanks but no thanks?
That seems odd to me.

An email/letter is actually a nicer way of rejecting someone, and saying thanks for your interest and time.

I doubt that with everything going on in todays workplace, someone has the time to craft a personalized rejection letter, its silly.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2012, 09:43 AM
 
Location: NJ
17,580 posts, read 21,138,047 times
Reputation: 15428
I wouldn't want the phone call. An email would be just fine.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2012, 10:41 AM
 
Location: property tax hell
2,020 posts, read 3,993,730 times
Reputation: 1591
Quote:
Originally Posted by crankywithakeyboard View Post
Yep, I was in the top 3 out of 100 applicants and did a sample presentation and several interviews and the lady told me "We don't have time to inform the ones we don't select."

Two people is too many to inform????
need to look at the bigger picture. The above still means 99 didn't make it... for this one position. Assuming they were hiring for 6 positions at that time and each had similar responses. You are now looking at potentially sending out almost 600 rejection letters. Not saying they couldn't have multiple rejection letters based on how far you got... but at some point, it becomes time consuming. Especially when its fairly normal for all communications between the hiring organization and candidates to go through HR.

Again, not defending their actions. Some will send a template letters...others will only respond to those that make it. But just saying that its not just a few letters here and there.

To the OP - I think many have already pointed it out. It's nothing personal. Move on, and hopefully you get what you're after soon enough.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2012, 01:46 PM
 
8,062 posts, read 8,661,670 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
seain dublin, Years ago, offices were overstaffed. Managers had secretaries whose true function was to make them feel important as they had direct staff. Today, with offices lean, and most likely filling dozen of spots annually, 2 letters of rejection times dozens is time not available.as the secretary who had nothing to do 90% of the time has been eliminated.

PLus, if corps sent out rejections, those cut before the final round would feel entitled too. Now we are up to 97 letters/emails per opening.

Just not a prudent use of time. I'm glad the OP got closure, but its not possible to provide that with the lean staffing levels necessary today.

Bob, in this scenario mentioned it involved sending out two e-mails.

That takes less than 2 minutes. It's a sign of the times and bad manners.

Has nothing to do with cuts in staffing.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2012, 01:50 PM
 
8,062 posts, read 8,661,670 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by macroy View Post
need to look at the bigger picture. The above still means 99 didn't make it... for this one position. Assuming they were hiring for 6 positions at that time and each had similar responses. You are now looking at potentially sending out almost 600 rejection letters. Not saying they couldn't have multiple rejection letters based on how far you got... but at some point, it becomes time consuming. Especially when its fairly normal for all communications between the hiring organization and candidates to go through HR.

Again, not defending their actions. Some will send a template letters...others will only respond to those that make it. But just saying that its not just a few letters here and there.

To the OP - I think many have already pointed it out. It's nothing personal. Move on, and hopefully you get what you're after soon enough.
Not all 100 applicants were interviewed. You don't need to send rejection e-mails to people who haven't even been seen.

But when someone comes in for 2 and 3 interviews, it is basic common courtersy to just let them know their status.

A quick e-mail which takes very little time is appropriate.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2012, 03:22 PM
 
21 posts, read 81,701 times
Reputation: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by seain dublin View Post
Not all 100 applicants were interviewed. You don't need to send rejection e-mails to people who haven't even been seen.

But when someone comes in for 2 and 3 interviews, it is basic common courtersy to just let them know their status.

A quick e-mail which takes very little time is appropriate.
I just want to add a fact that the group has 8 personnel and 1 Administrative Assistant. I communicated with the Assistant throughout the hiring process from phone calls to the meet and greet. The Assistant had plenty of time to call or send me a personalize email.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2012, 03:31 PM
 
16,980 posts, read 7,610,854 times
Reputation: 6293
seain, 2 or 3 might have gone to ALL interviews, but 25-30 might have gone to 1 interview. They invested time, too.

Sending emails is a slippery slope; you seem to think the 2 or 3 are owed one. Next, someone rejected in the round of 25-30 interviewed expects one. Multiply that hundreds of times per year, and its time not available.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top