Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is It Fair That Smokers Get Extra Breaks?
I am a smoker and it doesn't bother me 8 6.84%
Im a smoker and I DO NOT think it is fair 6 5.13%
Im a non smoker and it doesn't bother me 27 23.08%
Im a non smoker and I DO NOT think it is fair 76 64.96%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2012, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,896,363 times
Reputation: 7399

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Sorry but we had it this way for so long and there were no real way to avoid smokers. Don't want to go back. I don't believe in excessive government but smoking laws were long overdue.
So what you are saying is that your desire and convenience to breath smoke free air trumps the right of the business owner to make a decision about his own propety, even though you would be exposing yourself to the smoke willfuly? Isn't that a bit selfish?

It is never ok to give up liberty or freedom, no matter the circumstance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2012, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
2,309 posts, read 4,384,486 times
Reputation: 5355
Yes the freedom from smoke from those few left that do smoke.

There hasn't been an ashtray or cigarette lighter in new cars for quite sometime now as an example.


Non smoking is the norm just like it is your norm to contract cancer.
The stench, the disease the putrid vile end of life.
It is really quite the waist.


Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
So what you are saying is that your desire and convenience to breath smoke free air trumps the right of the business owner to make a decision about his own propety, even though you would be exposing yourself to the smoke willfuly? Isn't that a bit selfish?

It is never ok to give up liberty or freedom, no matter the circumstance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 08:30 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,938 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by chef.sunny22 View Post

You have the right to clean air at work.
Only if you own the place. Otherwise, you have a right to whatever it is you're offered. Take it or leave it, it's up to you.

In YOUR home, you have the right to demand I don't smoke. In YOUR business, you have the same. In mine, you don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 08:49 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,020,628 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
So what you are saying is that your desire and convenience to breath smoke free air trumps the right of the business owner to make a decision about his own propety, even though you would be exposing yourself to the smoke willfuly? Isn't that a bit selfish?

It is never ok to give up liberty or freedom, no matter the circumstance.
Who says that I am willingly exposing to cigarette smoke? If you are in an office working with a smoker, what choice do you have? Yes, you can look elsewhere for work but it isn't as if you can just snap your fingers and find a new place to work. Sorry but the smoking laws have been a blessing to many and it takes the burden off of business owners in addressing smoking related complaints, etc. Not everyone has the luxury of just quitting a job when a smoker lights up ... Besides, it isn't healthy for anyone to be in an enclosed room full of secondhand smoke ... Not healthy for the non-smoker nor the smoker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 08:51 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,020,628 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by DentalFloss View Post
Only if you own the place. Otherwise, you have a right to whatever it is you're offered. Take it or leave it, it's up to you.

In YOUR home, you have the right to demand I don't smoke. In YOUR business, you have the same. In mine, you don't.
Not in California and other states that have banned indoor smoking in public places
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 09:04 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,938 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Not in California and other states that have banned indoor smoking in public places
Sadly, not all states recognize private property rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 09:51 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,020,628 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by DentalFloss View Post
Sadly, not all states recognize private property rights.
Well ... If smokers would have been more considerate of their non-smoking co-workers and the public at large, we would not have needed these laws. Smokers made their bed, now they need to lie in it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 12:09 AM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,896,363 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Who says that I am willingly exposing to cigarette smoke? If you are in an office working with a smoker, what choice do you have?
Several
>Quit
>Actively look for new employment
>Politely explain to the smoker how their smoke bothers you
>Tell managment how the smoke bothers you and ask them to consider banning smokeing in the office. If there are others who feel the same way, get together and confront managment together.

Quote:
Yes, you can look elsewhere for work but it isn't as if you can just snap your fingers and find a new place to work
Without trying to sound rude or agressive, because I'm really not..... isn't that your problem? It's not theirs.

Quote:
. Sorry but the smoking laws have been a blessing
To you, perhaps, but they have been a burden to millions of business owners WORLDwide, and a blight on the so-called freedom from Government intrusion we are supposed to have in the US. Many have suffered because of these bans, but anti-smokers dont care what the damages are, so long as they dont have to be around the smoke.

Quote:
it takes the burden off of business owners in addressing smoking related complaints, etc.
You dont need a law to do this. If the issue of smoking in or around the workplace is such an ordeal, the owner could simply ban smoking on the property and restrict employees to smoking only during scheduled breaks. If they dont have scheduled breaks, restrict it only to lunch hour. If the smokers dont like it, they can find a new job. Problem solved. Amazing what can happen when we use reason and logic.

Quote:
Not everyone has the luxury of just quitting a job when a smoker lights up ...
Again, your problem.

Quote:
Besides, it isn't healthy for anyone to be in an enclosed room full of secondhand smoke ... Not healthy for the non-smoker nor the smoker
Everyone should be able to make their own decisions based on what they want to be exposed to health wise. We dont need anyone doing it for us. We dont need a nanny.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Not in California and other states that have banned indoor smoking in public places
You talk about it as if the smoking laws have been implemented for the sake of public health, and you couldn't be more wrong. Sure, thats the facade that these laws are passed under, but nothing could be further from the truth. They dont have your best interests at heart. There are several ways of proving this, but amongst the simplist is this.... If health were truly the issue, why not ban cigarettes altogether? Because there is far too much money to be made that is why. Too much money to be made selling quit drugs to those who no blonger want to be looked at as trash from the brainwashed public, too much money to be made by implementing laws that will result in fines for violators, too much money to be made by the taxes that smokers are unjustifiably foisted with to pay for programs to benefit all of society. All of this under the noses of the sheep-like, uninformed, misguided, uncaring public. Granted, it takes a little brain power and a lot more time, but if you are truly interested, do a little in depth research and you will expose the hypocrisy for what it is.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Well ... If smokers would have been more considerate of their non-smoking co-workers and the public at large, we would not have needed these laws.
Nonsense. Like I said, do a little research and expose to yourself the truth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DentalFloss View Post
Only if you own the place. Otherwise, you have a right to whatever it is you're offered. Take it or leave it, it's up to you.

In YOUR home, you have the right to demand I don't smoke. In YOUR business, you have the same. In mine, you don't.
^^^^^THIS^^^^^^

Sadly, people dont see it in these terms, the correct and reasonable terms.

Last edited by WhipperSnapper 88; 04-24-2012 at 12:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 04:52 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
2,727 posts, read 6,153,802 times
Reputation: 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Not in California and other states that have banned indoor smoking in public places

I believe CT has done that also. I'm not 100% sure on which places. I know the casino has a smoking AND a non-smoking area, but I know restaurants don't allow it. Bars - I am not sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 07:10 AM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,616,938 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Well ... If smokers would have been more considerate of their non-smoking co-workers and the public at large, we would not have needed these laws. Smokers made their bed, now they need to lie in it
Well, if government properly recognized real private property rights, as opposed to telling "owners" of property what they can and can't do with it (as though it were the government's property in the first place, which sadly, it is), they would realize they don't possess the authority to tell people they must ban smoking on their property.

What's mine, is mine, and it should be that it's none of anybody else's business what policies I choose to put in place regarding smoking.

Unfortunately, we live in a society that has chosen to give up our rights. But it doesn't have to be that way. However, with people like you, who think you have a "right" to demand others submit to your desires on their property, I don't think the prognosis is good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top