Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2014, 05:55 PM
 
10,737 posts, read 5,664,235 times
Reputation: 10863

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Being required to give up personal freedoms that have no bearing on your job reeks of slavery.
We've already been over that and it's CLEARLY not slavery. Continuing to repeat it won't make it so.

Quote:
What's next?......no alcohol, no marijuana, no motorcycles, no extreme sports?
I don't know what's next. But as long as it's legal, employers can place whatever restrictions they want on their employees. In an employee can choose not to work for an employer that isn't tolerant of their use of drugs (or anything else), why is it so surprising to you that an employer can choose not to hire someone that uses drugs (or anything else)? Those two situations are two sides of the exact same coin.

Quote:
Just how far do you think your employer should be able to reach into your personal life?
If it's legal, as far as they want, while still being able to maintain the employees necessary to run their business. However, it doesn't man that employers are free from negative repercussions of their actions. If the employer pushes too far, they will be unlikely to attract and retain employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2014, 06:01 PM
 
10,737 posts, read 5,664,235 times
Reputation: 10863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
I don't know why they just didn't say no to their employer.......

maybe because jobs aren't that easy to come by.

Should that make it OK for an employer to take advantage?.....just because he can?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwU35U_aGP0
If someone has made bad decisions, or hasn't invested sufficiently in his human capital, his choices may well be limited.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2014, 06:03 PM
 
10,737 posts, read 5,664,235 times
Reputation: 10863
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferraris View Post
TaxPhd, as I said earlier we simply disagree on this and neither one of us is likely to convince the other. In general I'm fine with such libertarian views, but you seem to be on the edge of anarcho-capitalism. I definitely understand your point of view, and I think you understand mine, so I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
OK. I've enjoyed the discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2014, 06:08 PM
 
10,737 posts, read 5,664,235 times
Reputation: 10863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
But that is not necessarily what we are talking about. Should an employer be able to prevent them from smoking on their own time in their own home?

That's what we are discussing.
Should they be ABLE to do it? Of course. Should they ACTUALLY do it? That is a much more complex question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2014, 07:15 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,903,092 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
Yeah, because slaves and employees are the same thing right? Employers buy employees at employee auctions, and keep them locked up.

Ridiculous comparison is ridiculous.
Youre confusing employees with politicians. Companies don't lock them up, but they do buy and sell them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2014, 09:55 PM
 
3,046 posts, read 4,124,870 times
Reputation: 2131
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
We've already been over that and it's CLEARLY not slavery. Continuing to repeat it won't make it so.



I don't know what's next. But as long as it's legal, employers can place whatever restrictions they want on their employees. In an employee can choose not to work for an employer that isn't tolerant of their use of drugs (or anything else), why is it so surprising to you that an employer can choose not to hire someone that uses drugs (or anything else)? Those two situations are two sides of the exact same coin.



If it's legal, as far as they want, while still being able to maintain the employees necessary to run their business. However, it doesn't man that employers are free from negative repercussions of their actions. If the employer pushes too far, they will be unlikely to attract and retain employees.
A hospital has every right not to hire anyone that is a smoker. It's a health care facility. Also it cost more to insure smokers I'm a x smoker so I have no problem with going to a smoke free hospital. Even visitors are banned from smokeing on hospital property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2014, 09:16 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,213,138 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by mapmd View Post
I wish my company (we're electricians) would get rid of our smokers and never hire any more.

Why should they get to take 5-7 minute breaks every hour to puff down their poison while the other person/others are working on their tasks?

Over the course of the day that adds up to half an hour or more of lost production, money they're getting compensated for while returning nothing of value; basically stealing from the company.

It's not a slippery slope at all. If you want to smoke then go smoke on your own time at home and around your wife and kids. Don't do it while your co-workers are putting in honest time and effort trying to earn an honest and fair living.
You miussed the point. This thread is about employers that don't permit them to go smoke on their own time in their own home. That is the slippery slope, not what rules they set in the actual workplace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2014, 01:43 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,903,092 times
Reputation: 9252
Here is some legal Mumbo-jumbo on the subject:
https://www.aclu.org/racial-justice_...tion-workplace
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2014, 02:30 PM
 
7,492 posts, read 11,826,650 times
Reputation: 7394
Well it's a little ironic that smokers are telling other people to stop smoking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2014, 10:45 PM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,277,139 times
Reputation: 28564
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
Here is some legal Mumbo-jumbo on the subject:
https://www.aclu.org/racial-justice_...tion-workplace
Here's what would work better:

A single-payer, universal system that is free at the point of use to all American citizens (and legal permanent residents who work and pay taxes) that takes employers out of the equation. That immediately renders any employer's cost argument moot.

How to punish smokers? Easy...do as they do in the UK. Tax the crap out of them and pass the collected tax revenue on to our universal healthcare system's coffers. Do the same with marijuana. And junk food. You can choose to smoke and eat garbage, but get ready to pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top