Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar
Some signs of it being a bad thing:
If he knows who the feedback is from
If you aren't also reviewing him.
|
Definitely agree with this. Eons ago I had a director at a Fortune 500 do this 360 BS and exactly in the manner quoted above. FWIW I was pretty sure he had ulterior motives for doing so and could freely edit/cherry pick all the 360 reviews. He had brought in some friends from his old job and clearly favored them and trumped up their small accomplishments. One of my peers was eager to brownnose and play the game. I was unimpressed with said director and his friends stealing credit at every opportunity. Another peer was struggling to stay relevant and in between brown-noser and myself in her reaction to the Director. I believe he did the exercise to gauge how we all felt about each other to his own/his friends advantages only, not out of any actual inclination to improve the team.
Truthfully I wouldn't go overboard writing glowing positives about others at best just be neutral.