Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2016, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
3,649 posts, read 4,494,397 times
Reputation: 5913

Advertisements

Let's just say I'd kill for #2 right now. I make 27k. An extra 15k a year I'd be rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2016, 04:07 PM
 
1,519 posts, read 1,334,819 times
Reputation: 2183
Not much I don't like buying stuff,I prefer living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Berkeley Neighborhood, Denver, CO USA
17,706 posts, read 29,796,003 times
Reputation: 33286
"How many extra hours would you be willing to work for $15k raise?"
Zero.
I am 67.4 years old.
Still working, but not willing to work more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 05:06 PM
 
1,149 posts, read 1,590,261 times
Reputation: 1403
That would be like a 75% increase for me, so I'd do just about anything, haha.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,836 posts, read 25,102,289 times
Reputation: 19060
Depends. If I was just starting out, I'd go with #2. In that case $15-20k probably makes a much bigger difference in total pay. For where I'm at now an extra 7.5 hours a week for an extra $15-20k isn't really a raise. Given the work environment is harder and taking home work, I'd go with the easier job that pays the same. I'm in a technical field though which while not that physical requires a great deal of precision and endurance. Management isn't something a lot of people really want. It doesn't really pay better, often pays less actually. Managers are usually people who are older and physically can't work full-time anymore or could never do the job to begin with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 08:48 PM
 
2,813 posts, read 2,111,908 times
Reputation: 6129
Quote:
Originally Posted by macroy View Post
Assuming you're not in the sunset of your career. The bolded is what I would key on. Even if the pay is reversed in that the longer hours is for less pay. In the long run, you have a better opportunity for more skills/experience, which his likely to get your more money.

IMO, it's a mistake to make decisions that impact you in the long run using short term factors.
Yes. I agree with this^^

The ONLY reason I'd choose #1 is if you were winding down your career.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 08:49 PM
 
5,455 posts, read 3,381,212 times
Reputation: 12177
Quote:
Originally Posted by usamathman View Post
Wondering what you all think about this situation.


Opportunity #1

Standard 8:30 - 5:30 position.

Short commute. Small company. Low to Medium stress environment. No work taken home.


Experience may or may not open more doors in the future.

Opportunity #2

Management position


8 - 6:30 schedule with occasional work taken home (once week)


Short commute. Large company. Medium to High stress environment. Experience will open doors to much better opportunities


Pay will be anywhere from $15 to $20k higher than opportunity #1


-------------------------------

Let's assume the individual working has no children or wife to worry about.


Which sounds more appealing to you? Higher Salary or less stress/more free time?

Higher salary until you burn out then go on disability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 10:08 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57750
You do need to know the pay. For someone making $35k, going to $50k is likely to be a big deal. For someone making $150k most of the increase would just go to additional taxes and not be worth the stress and extra hours. For me that's only about a 5% increase, and I just got 4% just based on my annual performance review.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,332,595 times
Reputation: 73931
A month?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2016, 12:56 AM
 
Location: Estonia
1,759 posts, read 1,878,279 times
Reputation: 1109
I think all salaries should be given for a 40-hour workweek. Someone making 100k working 80 hours a week is actually making 50k. If I have to work extra for a raise it's not a raise, it's forced overtime. But then I'm in Europe, it's all different here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top