Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-21-2016, 09:23 AM
 
1,768 posts, read 1,633,842 times
Reputation: 1597

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Heard the same from neighbors whose companies are trying to hire. Said that they were flooded with applicants a few years ago but just a handful coming in now. Several applicants pulled their resumes recently, stating they had changed their mind about moving to NC.

Good to know. Might be time to look for a new job in the next year if demand is there and supply is low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2016, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,341 posts, read 14,166,011 times
Reputation: 27858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moby Hick View Post
And Trump is going to have Mexico build the wall, taking jobs from Americans.
Wrong!


He is going to have Mexico PAY for the wall.


And he'll do it by currency manipulation, or by putting a tariff on Mexican products, or something to that effect. All good. I for one am SICK of illegal immigration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,341 posts, read 14,166,011 times
Reputation: 27858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jukesgrrl View Post
The economy has improved. It certainly is NOT "liberal rhetoric." Jobs are not as secure or as well-paid as they used to be, but that's the result of Wall Street demanding growth every quarter and the 1% thinking their needs are paramount over the welfare of the average citizen. Large corporations are still sending jobs overseas and manipulating the tax codes to avoid paying their fair share.

But it's not as impossible to get a job as it was five years ago. In recent months the jobless rate held steady at 5%, down from 2009's peak of 10%. The Dow is up and business foreclosure filings have fallen to near a 10-year low. Throughout the recovery, inflation for consumers has remained low and gas prices have been very low this year.

Of course there are still problems to address. Wages are still stagnant. The Federal debt has not been lowered significantly beyond the terrible rise it took during the Bush Administration. The tax code remains a mess despite the fact that corporations are finding it harder to beat it under Obama. Bill Clinton remains the modern president who has added the least to the Federal debt. Finally, we continue to demand that young people get college educations yet do nothing to help them financially. And the debt they incur makes it harder for them to become homeowners, something that has always been a hallmark of our middle class.
Hey lady -- Obama has run up more debt by far than any other president.
Sooner or later you have to stop blaming George W Bush for everything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 12:00 PM
 
Location: La Mesa Aka The Table
9,802 posts, read 11,485,193 times
Reputation: 11880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staggerlee666 View Post
Thing is he is skilled at complaining and writing silly posts on City-Data...not exactly skills someone will pay for.
ROFLROFROFL


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jukesgrrl View Post
The economy has improved. It certainly is NOT "liberal rhetoric." Jobs are not as secure or as well-paid as they used to be, but that's the result of Wall Street demanding growth every quarter and the 1% thinking their needs are paramount over the welfare of the average citizen. Large corporations are still sending jobs overseas and manipulating the tax codes to avoid paying their fair share.

But it's not as impossible to get a job as it was five years ago. In recent months the jobless rate held steady at 5%, down from 2009's peak of 10%. The Dow is up and business foreclosure filings have fallen to near a 10-year low. Throughout the recovery, inflation for consumers has remained low and gas prices have been very low this year.

Of course there are still problems to address. Wages are still stagnant. The Federal debt has not been lowered significantly beyond the terrible rise it took during the Bush Administration. The tax code remains a mess despite the fact that corporations are finding it harder to beat it under Obama. Bill Clinton remains the modern president who has added the least to the Federal debt. Finally, we continue to demand that young people get college educations yet do nothing to help them financially. And the debt they incur makes it harder for them to become homeowners, something that has always been a hallmark of our middle class.
Quote of the day!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Hey lady -- Obama has run up more debt by far than any other president.
Sooner or later you have to stop blaming George W Bush for everything.
Yes, she was wrong on GW running up the debt.
Beside the political overtures of your post to jujegrrl, how do feel about the rest of her post?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 04:53 PM
 
2,924 posts, read 1,581,431 times
Reputation: 2498
George W. had run up more debt than any President before him. Then Obama came along and outdid him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Tucson for awhile longer
8,869 posts, read 16,276,082 times
Reputation: 29230
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Hey lady -- Obama has run up more debt by far than any other president.
Sooner or later you have to stop blaming George W Bush for everything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MongooseHugger View Post
George W. had run up more debt than any President before him. Then Obama came along and outdid him.

The national debt is complicated. First and foremost, do you count the increase in the debt in terms of dollar increases or percentage increases? There is a difference. Furthermore, when a president is elected, he doesn't even have a budget his first year in office. He deals with the previous president's budget and commitments. Like WAR for instance. Wars that one president started and another president is left to deal with. So to say one president has increased the debt more than another president can always be countered with another way of measuring.

Following are some facts, but something tells me you're more interested in blaming than understanding:
US Debt by President: By Dollar and Percent

Oh, and by the way, where's the shout-out for President Bill Clinton? He had the lowest increase in the national debt — no matter how it's measured — of any modern president, including REAGAN. Because he balanced our budget and didn't start any wars. But but but ... Monica!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 07:48 PM
 
4,295 posts, read 2,747,164 times
Reputation: 6215
I think when everyone talks about job growth, most of that is in health care. If they were to eliminate that from the equation, I wonder where we would be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Corona the I.E.
10,137 posts, read 17,432,484 times
Reputation: 9139
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccm123 View Post
Improving a lot, especially for knowledge workers.
Agreed it is. Pay offers are still a bit low but getting better and more openings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Planet Telex
5,887 posts, read 3,876,339 times
Reputation: 5839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jukesgrrl View Post
Oh, and by the way, where's the shout-out for President Bill Clinton?
Everything pales in comparison to the Bill and Newt tandem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 09:32 PM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,591,767 times
Reputation: 25616
Any major job cuts announcement helps Trump. People are just fed up with the establishment especially big business that offshore a lot of money and jobs like Intel.

If you look at every product Intel makes, it is either Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, etc. They are going to expand to even poorer nations to just keep cost down so the upper ranks can rake in more money. You could be some processor or circuit designer for intel with advance degree in math but put on the chopping block when they got what they needed from you and pass on the work to cheaper labor overseas.

Hillary loves Transpacific Agreement, she supported it before and now backtracked to get votes. You know if she's elected she'll change position again and say it's Good for America to send more jobs to the Pacific.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top