Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2017, 11:17 AM
 
305 posts, read 330,667 times
Reputation: 341

Advertisements

I'm in a 7 person dept in a large global company. I started almost 3 years ago and everyone who was hired after me and before me has quit. About 10 people. Except for 2 people who have been here over 10 and 20 years I'm the only one who has stuck it out. People can't handle the stress of the work volume or can't catch on and leave. My supervisor has made several people cry and walk out. Don't you think they should reevaluate how this job is handled or they don't mind constantly hiring people and training them just to quit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2017, 11:21 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,057 posts, read 31,258,424 times
Reputation: 47514
If they have this much turnover, they need a top to bottom reevaluation and overhaul of their hiring practices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2017, 12:11 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57749
It depends on where these people went and what they are doing now, and also what their experience was before. I have recently lost two of my staff, but to promotions in other departments, which I would consider normal progression. When hiring, there are specific requirements and interview questions to determine the applicant's ability to deal with stress, and the ability to learn complex processes. Then we have a probationary period (6 months) in case the person is not successful, because it's not that easy to tell in an interview whether someone is actually capable of handling the work. Stress, and learning complex processes and procedures are a normal part of many, if not most office jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2017, 12:28 PM
 
12,104 posts, read 23,262,756 times
Reputation: 27236
As long as they feel the work is getting done at an acceptable cost, there is nothing for them to reevaluate. Some jobs are also high turnover jobs that the employer does not expect anyone to make a career out of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2017, 12:38 PM
 
Location: In a city within a state where politicians come to get their PHDs in Corruption
2,907 posts, read 2,067,392 times
Reputation: 4478
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe from dayton View Post
As long as they feel the work is getting done at an acceptable cost, there is nothing for them to reevaluate. Some jobs are also high turnover jobs that the employer does not expect anyone to make a career out of.
It is shocking that most posters don't get this very simple concept.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2017, 01:18 PM
 
305 posts, read 330,667 times
Reputation: 341
I get it but people quit because they can't handle the work load they have to take over when other people quit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2017, 04:37 PM
 
7,977 posts, read 4,983,013 times
Reputation: 15951
High costly turnover, operating on skeleton crews with ridiculous OT, and a revolving door of employees with poor morale won't fly forever with a company in business to make a profit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2017, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
6,340 posts, read 4,892,353 times
Reputation: 17999
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojo775 View Post
Don't you think they should reevaluate how this job is handled or they don't mind constantly hiring people and training them just to quit?
Business owners make changes when the status quo cuts into their profits.

As long as the status quo doesn't cut into the profits the expendable employees who keep leaving don't change anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2017, 06:36 PM
 
Location: Here and now.
11,904 posts, read 5,582,296 times
Reputation: 12963
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojo775 View Post
I'm in a 7 person dept in a large global company. I started almost 3 years ago and everyone who was hired after me and before me has quit. About 10 people. Except for 2 people who have been here over 10 and 20 years I'm the only one who has stuck it out. People can't handle the stress of the work volume or can't catch on and leave. My supervisor has made several people cry and walk out. Don't you think they should reevaluate how this job is handled or they don't mind constantly hiring people and training them just to quit?
Saving this company from itself is not your job. If you are unhappy, and I suspect that you are, do yourself a favor and find another position.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2017, 06:58 PM
 
134 posts, read 103,104 times
Reputation: 349
My employer has an extremely heavy turnover in one particular job area, the job area I work. When I interviewed, I asked about it but was met with lots of stories of positive feedback from Glassdoor (and some bad) as well as examples of positive stories about long term employees, including my interviewers who highlighted their lengths of service. I Didn't know enough about true company structure to realize how truly messsed up it is and how much the local manager influenced turnover rates Some managers have zero turnover, a lot have heavy turnover including mine. Haven't even been here 2 years and I'm second in seniority on my team, number one has two years. Six people have left or been fired just on my team of six.

Mgmt is not trained be management nor do they have mgmt experience. They might have been great sales people but are totally in incompetent as managers. There is no oversight of them at all. There is one main guy these mgrs report too but he is too busy with other more profitable areas and a few of these bad managers were his boss years ago.

This costs the company a fortune as our territories take at least a year or more to build once a Rep leaves. and, as the company is starting to notice once customers leave they don't come back
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top