Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2018, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Here and there, you decide.
12,908 posts, read 27,982,887 times
Reputation: 5056

Advertisements

Can anyone give insight on this? I read that the circuit court gave an opinion regarding unpaid vacation as backpay.

Can I get any links to this


Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2018, 03:17 PM
 
13,131 posts, read 20,972,911 times
Reputation: 21410
There was a ruling last year that said if an employer in NV is paying out unused vacation pay at termination, it's considered time for the purpose of wages. This means if the pay calculation is based on a time period (example one day of vacation is paid as if 8 hours of work) the vacation payout is worked wages, not non-worked wages. The ruling also changed the "policy provision" and instead of an employer be required to payout if they have a policy of paying out, I belive it changed that to an employer must pay out unless they have a policy saying they do not pay out. However the issue of vacation payouts as wages goes more to the benefits derived from have the money classified as work wages instead of just a payment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Here and there, you decide.
12,908 posts, read 27,982,887 times
Reputation: 5056
where can I find this.... I was termed and just lost 70 hours of paid time off that was previously approved..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2018, 08:35 AM
 
13,131 posts, read 20,972,911 times
Reputation: 21410
What do you mean you lost 70 hours of Paid Time Off that was previously approved? Did you actually accrue those 70 hours at time of termination? Does your company (written or verbal) have a policy of not paying out accrued vacation upon termination? As mentioned, the ruling is less about having to pay for accrued vacation and more about how the pay is classified as work wages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2018, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Here and there, you decide.
12,908 posts, read 27,982,887 times
Reputation: 5056
I had 70 hours that I was using (approved) for late April vacation. No knowledge of payment of pto whether termed or not
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2018, 02:21 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,550 posts, read 81,103,317 times
Reputation: 57750
Quote:
Originally Posted by airics View Post
I had 70 hours that I was using (approved) for late April vacation. No knowledge of payment of pto whether termed or not
You have to know what their policy is. Our earned PTO can be sold back and added to our pay and upon termination we are paid for it at 50% of our pay rate at that time. Not all companies do that, and if yours has a policy of not paying for PTO you can't get anything for it, regardless of the state. Paid acation/PTO is not a required benefit in most jurisdictions, in fact many places do not require paid sick leave. In our state that only started 1/1/2018, but some cities like Seattle have their own sick leave laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Here and there, you decide.
12,908 posts, read 27,982,887 times
Reputation: 5056
I was asking for the 9th circuit court ruling which states pto is considered backpay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 04:35 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,701,479 times
Reputation: 8798
You'll have to be more specific about which ruling you are referring to, because I've never seen any ruling from any circuit court that established that "approval" of vacation time constituted an obligation on the part of the employer to pay for that vacation time at termination. Generally, the rulings have cited either "earning" or "accrual" of vacation time, or company policy, as the governing concern.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top