Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2018, 07:59 AM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 5 days ago)
 
35,620 posts, read 17,953,728 times
Reputation: 50641

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
YouTube vids of the incident have comments added by residents who issued anti-stalking orders against this perp, as well as other waitstaff he grabbed.


I would hope they offer to testify at his trial.


It appears this is hardly a one-off.
Well why didn't they say that in the original article? You've got a guy who's done this multiple times and has antistalking orders against him, by other waitstaff yes, it's time to involve the cops and put a stop to this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:02 AM
 
Location: In a city within a state where politicians come to get their PHDs in Corruption
2,907 posts, read 2,068,439 times
Reputation: 4478
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbrains View Post
Are you implying that because other cultures have terrible attitudes towards women, even worse than ours, a bit of mild misogyny should be overlooked?
No. How can a smart guy like you not see further from your nose? Tell me, please.

I've had a (dis)pleasure of vising Riyadh for couple of days. When I was at a mall, I saw young men (religious police) circling the mall and "advising" men and women on how they should interact with each other.

The only difference between the religious police in Saudi Arabia and cops in this incident is the morality they're enforcing.

Last edited by PJSaturn; 05-29-2018 at 09:30 AM.. Reason: Fixed technical glitch in quote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:08 AM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,056,322 times
Reputation: 17197
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
Well why didn't they say that in the original article? You've got a guy who's done this multiple times and has antistalking orders against him, by other waitstaff yes, it's time to involve the cops and put a stop to this.
Most likely because this waitress was the first one gutsy enough to take a stand.

I am sure the cops and d.a. considered it, hence the charge was brought up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Rural Wisconsin
19,803 posts, read 9,353,220 times
Reputation: 38338
Sorry, but as others have said, jail time is unreasonable and excessive. Either one week in jail or a $5,000 fine would accomplish the same thing.

But I am glad that at least the publicity over this is accomplishing at least one thing -- and that is the fact that such behavior is completely WRONG, and if anyone does this, he (or she) might be in BIG trouble with consequences to match.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:09 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,044,002 times
Reputation: 21914
Quote:
Originally Posted by tolovefromANFIELD View Post
Come one, now. You're taking extreme examples and extrapolating them to the overall population. It's the same reasoning used to keep weed from being legal. "It's a gateway drug"!!! I've been grabbed before, often by drunk or unstable women, and yet I was able to keep it from escalating, and I'm pretty sure none of them were arrested for rape or habitual harassment down the road.

The state shouldn't be involved in policing morality.
So the state should take no stance if I punch you in the nose? That isn’t a threat obviously, I am simply drawing another analogy, one that I think is more appropriate than your weed legalization.

I also take objection to your assertion that this is about morality. To an extent there is a sexual element, but the big issue is one of being safe. One personal right to freedom extends to the safety of their body, and here you are saying that doesn’t matter.

Let’s also be realistic here. Men are up to twice the size of women. I am a rather large guy myself, and if I wanted to grab a woman, there are very few who could physically stop me. Conversely, although a woman could sneak a grab in on me, if I wasn’t thrilled by it I could end it immediately and definitively. Women cannot do that.

Additionally, there is a power dynamic at work here. The woman’s livelihood, in terms of nightly tips, rests on this. She cannot simply and easily confront a customer without incurring a financial penalty, or maybe losing her job.

The guy was predatory, and a small penalty is appropriate. Not a year in jail, but something to punish and deter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:11 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,044,002 times
Reputation: 21914
Quote:
Originally Posted by tolovefromANFIELD View Post
No. How can a smart guy like you not see further from your nose? Tell me, please.

I've had a (dis)pleasure of vising Riyadh for couple of days. When I was at a mall, I saw young men (religious police) circling the mall and "advising" men and women on how they should interact with each other.

The only difference between the religious police in Saudi Arabia and cops in this incident is the morality they're enforcing.
A simple misunderstanding. I did not think along the lines of the anecdote you now relate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:12 AM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,056,322 times
Reputation: 17197
Quote:
Originally Posted by tolovefromANFIELD View Post

The state shouldn't be involved in policing morality.
They aren't. They are involved because one stranger forcibly touched another stranger in a portion of her body where the touch is only proper if it involved a spouse, or other significant other. Period.

If he smacks his wife's butt, it is not a crime. But if the waitress's bf smacked the patron's wife's butt, that is a crime.

Its not a morality issue, but a violation of invading another person's body issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:16 AM
 
Location: In a city within a state where politicians come to get their PHDs in Corruption
2,907 posts, read 2,068,439 times
Reputation: 4478
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbrains View Post
So the state should take no stance if I punch you in the nose? That isn’t a threat obviously, I am simply drawing another analogy, one that I think is more appropriate than your weed legalization.

I also take objection to your assertion that this is about morality. To an extent there is a sexual element, but the big issue is one of being safe. One personal right to freedom extends to the safety of their body, and here you are saying that doesn’t matter.

Let’s also be realistic here. Men are up to twice the size of women. I am a rather large guy myself, and if I wanted to grab a woman, there are very few who could physically stop me. Conversely, although a woman could sneak a grab in on me, if I wasn’t thrilled by it I could end it immediately and definitively. Women cannot do that.

Additionally, there is a power dynamic at work here. The woman’s livelihood, in terms of nightly tips, rests on this. She cannot simply and easily confront a customer without incurring a financial penalty, or maybe losing her job.

The guy was predatory, and a small penalty is appropriate. Not a year in jail, but something to punish and deter.
I agree with you with everything you said, except the last sentence. I don't think the state should be involved in everything we find objectionable, if for no other reason that state has almost all the power, while old men like this creep have almost no power, and eventually get their due.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:21 AM
 
Location: In a city within a state where politicians come to get their PHDs in Corruption
2,907 posts, read 2,068,439 times
Reputation: 4478
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
They aren't. They are involved because one stranger forcibly touched another stranger in a portion of her body where the touch is only proper if it involved a spouse, or other significant other. Period.

If he smacks his wife's butt, it is not a crime. But if the waitress's bf smacked the patron's wife's butt, that is a crime.

Its not a morality issue, but a violation of invading another person's body issue.
Ever rode public transportation during a rush hour in just about any major US city? How about sit in an aisle seat on a commercial airplane? I can't tell you how many times I've had someone's crotch, or an ass in my face.

Of course it's about morality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2018, 08:22 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,044,002 times
Reputation: 21914
Quote:
Originally Posted by tolovefromANFIELD View Post
I agree with you with everything you said, except the last sentence. I don't think the state should be involved in everything we find objectionable, if for no other reason that state has almost all the power, while old men like this creep have almost no power, and eventually get their due.
If i remember correctly, don’t you hold to a pretty extreme libertarian, Randian philosophy? You dislike government in virtually all aspects?

The problem with applying that philosophy to this specific incident is one of practicality. Whether you agree with it or not, we do have a system that includes rule of law. The woman’s options are constrained by this, and the law provides her with options as well.

You may wish our society was different, but as it isn’t, it seems best to me to discuss issues like this by acknowledging reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top