U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 03-29-2010, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
1,278 posts, read 490,222 times
Reputation: 885
Default Does a company's limited growth strategy = said company's demise?

I want to ask you all a question just to gauge your perception.

For the sake of this question, let's assume the economy is strong. Let's say you had a conversation with your manager about where you'd like to be in the next few years. Your manager responds by telling you that there's not much opportunity for you to go anywhere with the company, not necessarily because of your performance, but because of limited room in the company. Do you consider this company to be poorly run, or do you consider this to be the norm? Does a company that has such a limited growth strategy stand much of a chance at survival?

IMO, a lot of people take jobs with a company assuming/hoping there will be room to move up. In many cases, I think it's true that when a company doesn't provide much room for growth, they have a difficult time retaining talent. In addition, I hold the belief that a company that doesn't strive to grow has significantly less of a chance at survival than those that do. Do you guys think that I have a valid opinion, or am I too much of an idealist?

I'm very curious what your thoughts are. Thanks for the responses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 03-29-2010, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Up in the air above Boston
16,034 posts, read 8,558,823 times
Reputation: 11893
Well, in some companies there is just no going anywhere. With the company I work for, the only way I would 'work up' is by becoming a multi-engine jet pilot or getting my A&P license. Even then, it wouldn't necessarily be moving 'up', it would just be moving around.

I'm basically my own department, with my own budget and my own job descriptions. Eventually I may get an assistant, but not until we open the new facility next year. Even then, I'm not going anywhere
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-29-2010, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
1,278 posts, read 490,222 times
Reputation: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetJockey View Post
Well, in some companies there is just no going anywhere. With the company I work for, the only way I would 'work up' is by becoming a multi-engine jet pilot or getting my A&P license. Even then, it wouldn't necessarily be moving 'up', it would just be moving around.

I'm basically my own department, with my own budget and my own job descriptions. Eventually I may get an assistant, but not until we open the new facility next year. Even then, I'm not going anywhere
My question is aimed more at those companies/industries that have significant room in between the lowest and highest pay grades (e.g. file clerk --> Admin. Asst. I --> Admin. Asst. II --> Admin. Asst. III --> Asst. Manager --> Office Manager --> Operations Manager --> CFO --> CEO).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-29-2010, 10:06 AM
 
536 posts, read 849,028 times
Reputation: 292
I don't care about a companies future growth for moving up, it is more for job retention.

If they don't have a decent outlook then they are probably looking to move into a different field, poorly run, overstaffed, etc. All signs to either not start working there, or get the resume out if you do. I am always aware of these signs and so far have managed to get out in time.

If I want a pomotion or new position, I will look for another job. Most of my jobs, unless I move into upper management, will not change much from a day to day standpoint. Sure, my title could change, all the way to supervisor, but I will still have the same repsonsibilities. Unless you can switch departments it will be as JetJockey says, and more like moving around.

Now, in the past, I have hoped to move up in a company. More often than not most places seem to hire from the outside. Not to mention you could get a 20 to 25 raise moving on, rather than taking a 10% at your current job for what will probably amount to a few more responsibilites tacked onto what you already do.

I do agree with you mcb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-30-2010, 12:37 AM
 
4,384 posts, read 1,654,704 times
Reputation: 1612
It could mean a number of things:

- the company doesn't like to hire internally much (it should be a balance between internal and external, but this depends on the firm in question)

- the company has an old boys network in place, and anybody not in this network is excluded from promotion

I agree with you, in that a company that does not have good retention/employee relations policies wouldn't prosper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-03-2010, 11:39 PM
 
Location: Troy, Il
764 posts, read 594,634 times
Reputation: 408
My Mother is a senior vice president of a bank, so she is about 3 places from the top. The bank is a good size and has probably 8 or 9 branches. But they havent been growing much or at all for quite a while. But my mom has moved up several times, she started as a computer networker. The point is, just because the company is not growing that doesnt mean you cant take someone else's spot. This bank is very quick to boot people "to the basement." They dont fire, they just move you to someplace unimportant until you quit, and move someone else who is more compitant into your place. Just because a company is not growing doesnt mean you cant be promoted, big business is always looking for the best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:12 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top