Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2010, 01:27 PM
 
16,956 posts, read 16,745,177 times
Reputation: 10408

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
Yes, she should have been fired.

She followed the thief out into a parking lot and that is a big no-no.

Imagine the million dollar lawsuit if this single mother had been shot and killed. The uproar over WalMarts total failure and disregard for an employees safety on the job would have been deafening.
Employees are shot and killed INSIDE stores everyday ( think 7-11 ) Conveinance Stores ...so what is to prevent a multi million dollar lawsuit ?

Employees ( Pharmacy ) are shot and killed too for the drugs behind the counter.

I think the point by some here is : Loss prevention personnel are trained ( supposedly ) to handle shoplifters. Maybe thats where Walmart gets its policy. A cashier might not be trained in reducing theft loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2010, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Spokane via Sydney,Australia
6,612 posts, read 12,836,588 times
Reputation: 3132
She wasn't a cashier, she was a customer service manager according to the article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 02:07 PM
 
26,585 posts, read 62,017,224 times
Reputation: 13166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opyelie View Post
She wasn't a cashier, she was a customer service manager according to the article.
In Wal-Mart that basically means she's a cashier at the returns desk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,131,824 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by manderly6 View Post
Rules like this usually come from past experience. I'm guessing either employees getting very injured or killed or the employee suing Walmart for not "protecting" them.
More likely, to prevent getting sued by people who are misidentified as shoplifters. Detaining somebody against their will (or attempting to do so) opens up a whole can of worms in terms of liability. You'd better be damn sure they're actually guilty or they'll have solid grounds to sue your ass off even if you acted in good faith. Even more so if you try to detain them outside the premises.

So yes, while it sounds cruel and stupid and counterproductive to fire an employee for stopping a shoplifter, a company like Walmart that has a whole lot to lose has very good reason to insist that only those who have specific training in loss prevention go about trying to physically intercede, and to take such a policy very seriously, and to enforce it with impunity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,131,824 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by cocytus View Post
Hmm

First mistake: Working for WalMart
Second mistake: Not immediately retaining a lawyer after termination.
Third mistake: Talking to the press BEFORE you retain a lawyer

Sue them...collect a settlement...move on w/ your life.
Oh yeah,,,and get out of retail...LOL
Sue on what grounds?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Fort Wayne
470 posts, read 1,154,994 times
Reputation: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
Sue on what grounds?
Wrongful termination.
Injury at the workplace.
Stress.
Just to stick it to WalMart.
Take your pick.
I see a settlement on the horizon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 05:17 PM
 
Location: nyc
217 posts, read 553,911 times
Reputation: 171
That totally sucks. I remember when I was younger I would see people shoplift at the health food store I worked at and I was also told never approach them. I would not have done anything anyway, its not my stuff and I would never endanger my life for someone else's business. If it was my store your getting f'd up. Im not saving Walmart one computer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,131,824 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by cocytus View Post
Wrongful termination.
Injury at the workplace.
Stress.
Just to stick it to WalMart.
Take your pick.
I see a settlement on the horizon.
I don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Northern NH
4,550 posts, read 11,693,803 times
Reputation: 3873
Quote:
Originally Posted by annerk View Post
You've obviously never worked in retail. Anyone that has will tell you that it's stressed over and over that you NEVER leave the store to stop a shoplifter. Ever. If she isn't smart enough to follow that rule, what others isn't she following that she just isn't getting caught at. Nope, she broke a cardinal rule of retail. The last two retail jobs I had it was written write in teh company handbook that it was a terminable offense. Why shouldn't she be fired?
Pretty much everything says "up to and including termination" you can pretty much get fired for breathing wrong. I can see this being the other way and the employee getting fired for NOT asking to see the receipt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 07:18 PM
JS1
 
1,896 posts, read 6,765,902 times
Reputation: 1622
Geez, and we wonder why stores lose so much money to shoplifters.

Shoplifting isn't just for people who want free stuff -- people steal from stores and sell the stuff on ebay. Shoplifting is their job, and it's tax-free, too!

If I ran a store, I would allow my employees to go after shoplifters, if and only if, the stealing is obvious enough to be able to testify to that under oath (like in this case, notice that no one is defending the alleged shoplifter). Think about it -- shoplifters don't sue!

My store would quickly be known in the shoplifter circles as the place NOT to steal. Go steal from Wal-Mart where they fire the employee so you can get away with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top