It is so questionable thread... What is the criteria to point out the best?

Is that millitary campains? Or is that how many people were saved? Or is that how is somebody rulled the country? Or what kind of reforms were produced?
It is very hard to say who is the best, because there are numbers of the historical events, which were changed through the time of the written history in one or another turn acceptable by people during different times. Also there are not one political leader in the world rulles/d without a numbers of advisers for his/her actions and "brain washing" for the mass.
Or perhaps criteria is how many followers and supporters leader has/had?
Then Walt Disney # 1.
Homer, Schekspire (hope I spelled him right

), "Beatles"
Karl Marx and his oppositioner Adam Smith. Both theoretics divided the world into 2 parts of the ideology - how to run economy. Still both of them, perhaps without their own knowledge about that, have a lot of followers and supporters around the world. Big mess, so - ouch!!!
Millitary campains - Alexander the Great, Kutuzov - because their unpredictable movements for their enemies and saving their own solders.
Political arena:
Julius Ceasar - right time, right place, right movements.
George Washington - right time, right place, right movements.
Piter the Great - right time, right place, right movements.
Margarett Tetcher (maybe I misspelled

) - iron lady, but right time, right place, right movements.
M. Ghandy - right time, right place, right movements.
Regards.
p.s.: Hitler was mentaly ill and had a lot of personal issues to deal with, so Stalin, so Ivan the Terrible, so Calligula, so Bonaparte, I guess, Lenin too, had something going on and so many others. Because of the illness or the personal issues - all of them ended up being very bloody, with the bloody reforms to run things inside and outside the country.
Because of low self-esteem at first, like personalities, or some event within their personal life, receiving the political power and having their personalities issues, they needed to have exit for their inside anger or whatever was inside their brain. Well, I just could not rate them like the best world leaders because of their personal health problems or another personal issues predominated in their decisions, so they weren't normal themselves. If they would - nobody knows how historical events would turned for them like for the leaders.