Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is globally more influential/important?
the Bay Area (San Francisco) 37 41.11%
Moscow 43 47.78%
Toronto 10 11.11%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2013, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,871 posts, read 37,990,949 times
Reputation: 11635

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
This thread isn't about the 'top' or 'greatest' cities either, so...
True, but this is what you said, citing wealth concerns:

The often lauded 'top 4' cities in the world(NY, London, Paris, Tokyo) that people constantly talk about when ranking cities is totally shaken up here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2013, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,871 posts, read 37,990,949 times
Reputation: 11635
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
And just look at the Pacific Rim

Individuals Worth $30 Millon+, 2013
Top 10 Cities
1 New York 8,025
2 London 6,360
3 Tokyo 6,015
4 Los Angeles 4,945
5 San Francisco 4,840
6 Osaka 3,300
7 Paris 3,195
8 Hong Kong 3,180
9 Mexico City 2,695
10 Washington DC 2,675

The often lauded 'top 4' cities in the world(NY, London, Paris, Tokyo) that people constantly talk about when ranking cities is totally shaken up here as Paris has a considerably smaller concentration of ultra high net worth individuals than both Los Angeles AND San Francisco and is even narrowly beaten by Osaka, with HK right on it's heels.
So I guess what this means is that Mexico City is only marginally less attractive, desirable, influential and important as a global city than Paris is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2013, 12:22 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,511,478 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
So I guess what this means is that Mexico City is only marginally less attractive, desirable, influential and important as a global city than Paris is?
And Osaka is more important than Paris, Shanghai, or Beijing apparently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2013, 12:51 PM
 
98 posts, read 178,149 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
And just look at the Pacific Rim

Individuals Worth $30 Millon+, 2013
Top 10 Cities
1 New York 8,025
2 London 6,360
3 Tokyo 6,015
4 Los Angeles 4,945
5 San Francisco 4,840
6 Osaka 3,300
7 Paris 3,195
8 Hong Kong 3,180
9 Mexico City 2,695
10 Washington DC 2,675

The often lauded 'top 4' cities in the world(NY, London, Paris, Tokyo) that people constantly talk about when ranking cities is totally shaken up here as Paris has a considerably smaller concentration of ultra high net worth individuals than both Los Angeles AND San Francisco and is even narrowly beaten by Osaka, with HK right on it's heels.
Wealth and money are good measures of power and influence (unfortunately). So yes, looking at concentrations of wealth is a great way to measure power and influence. Can anyone suggest a better way?

Also, intuitively, when you think of great cities, you think San Francisco before Moscow. I have lived in different parts of Asia and America (more than 5 yeasr in a stretch), and based on experience, San Francisco always comes first to people's mind. Not saying that's an accurate measure of "influence" but it's something.

Again, where is Toronto? Have we established that Moscow is more important and powerful than Toronto?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2013, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,472,171 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
So I guess what this means is that Mexico City is only marginally less attractive, desirable, influential and important as a global city than Paris is?
Actually what it DOES mean is that in all likelihood, despite the hype and regard heaped upon Paris, at the end of the day, looked down upon Mexico City only has marginally less ultra high net worth individuals.

Im convinced that the issue of power and influence in cities has less to do with history, architecture etc and more to do with the kinds of people who live in them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2013, 01:08 PM
 
26,772 posts, read 22,518,410 times
Reputation: 10037
Quote:
Originally Posted by johan66 View Post
Wealth and money are good measures of power and influence (unfortunately). So yes, looking at concentrations of wealth is a great way to measure power and influence.
No it's not, because in the modern world the cities are not going at wars with other powerful and influencial cities directly, as it used to be in earlier times in history, but the decisions that truly influence the turn of events are made through politicians, who might work/reside in some ( financially) more modest cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2013, 01:26 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,511,478 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by johan66 View Post
Again, where is Toronto? Have we established that Moscow is more important and powerful than Toronto?
Well, Moscow's hockey team is probably better in recent years. Though who knows, the Maple Leafs are looking pretty good this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2013, 01:37 PM
 
1,325 posts, read 2,364,563 times
Reputation: 1062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
Well, Moscow's hockey team is probably better in recent years. Though who knows, the Maple Leafs are looking pretty good this year.
Dynamo Moscow vs. Leafs vs. Sharks! Tough call between Dynamo and Leafs as have the second most cups, but nothing recently. Dynamo numerous championships in the various leagues. Sharks have nothing, but starting the year strong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2013, 01:45 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,511,478 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by gichicago View Post
Dynamo Moscow vs. Leafs vs. Sharks! Tough call between Dynamo and Leafs as have the second most cups, but nothing recently. Dynamo numerous championships in the various leagues. Sharks have nothing, but starting the year strong.
Sharks are looking really good this year. Hertl was a great draft pick and playing on a line with Thornton has helped both of them. Though as a Sharks fan since their first season(back when they played at the Cow Palace), I've learned to be cautiously optimisitic regarding early successes with them since they often falter in the playoffs.

Maple Leafs are finally getting a good team together, but for years they've been the New York Knicks of the NHL. Fun fact though, the last time Toronto won a Stanley Cup, the current oldest player in the NHL, Teemu Selanne, wouldn't even be born for another three years and Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band had just been released.

Last edited by Deezus; 10-23-2013 at 02:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2013, 02:03 PM
 
1,217 posts, read 2,598,108 times
Reputation: 1358
Quote:
Originally Posted by johan66 View Post
Again, where is Toronto? Have we established that Moscow is more important and powerful than Toronto?
The reason is because Toronto is more inwardly focused on Canada. It is the business center of Canada but the industries for the most part don't have as much global influence like the way SF/SV companies/technologies do. SF/SV also has among the highest concentration of wealthy people (many self made), talented workforce, economic productivity levels and some of the best educational institutions in the world (Stanford, Berk). Toronto is a very well rounded city but it is more focused on Canada which is a country of 34 million. Although Canada is a top 10 country GDP-wise so it does garner prominence from this. It is also not the political center of Canada like Moscow is and Russian interactions with US/China/Iran/Former USSR states/etc. are globally important. Moscow also houses a lot of oil power whereas the oil resources/head offices in Canada are mostly out west. In terms of social influence, SF has had some famous movements and Moscow has a much longer storied history in terms of culture and the sciences as well. So for these reasons I would say SF and Moscow have more global importance/influence.

Last edited by johnathanc; 10-23-2013 at 02:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top