Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hey, this big stupid American knows where Afghanistan and Tunisia are on a map too....
And I've met many a European who thought that on their trip to the US, they could visit NYC, then take a two day road trip (stopping at interesting sights along the way) and be in San Francisco or Seattle on the third day. And that's no lie.
That's more a problem with time and distances. Because we almost never drive more than a day in Europe (or we take the plane/train), we are quite bad at assessing the time it would take for a very long trip. American are probably, in average, better at this.
I think Europeans are better in geography in average. Living in smaller countries mean, most of the time, more interest in foreign lands and more international news coverage as well.
@burgler09
The "they don't even know where mississipi is" argument is tiresome. Even if the majority of Europeans would struggle to locate it correctly, they would mostly know it's an American state.
But if I tell you : Mato Grosso, Primorye or Bayankhongor, can you locate them ? I couldn't. And they are bigger than Mississipi. Poitou Charantes, Mecklenburg or North Yorkshire ? Yeah, you don't give a damn about those. And seriously most people feel the same about American states. Why ? Because they are absolutely irrelevant internationally. I can book a trip to Mississippi with zero interaction from something or someone from there. While your federal government would know everything about this. And I'm 100% sure the USA's subdivisions are the best known from foreigners.
And I've met many a European who thought that on their trip to the US, they could visit NYC, then take a two day road trip (stopping at interesting sights along the way) and be in San Francisco or Seattle on the third day. And that's no lie.
I decided to sit on the side. But I don't have any beer at work.
WORK!! There's that four letter word again.
Americans are no worse than anyone else but given there are over 300 million of them the chances are that when that microphone or camera gets shoved into the face of an unsuspecting person it could be that person with less than a stellar familiarity with the worlds geography.
Give 'em a break. How many of ALL Canadians could name the various countries of Europe or Africa and position them accurately on a map?
Once in a while, I hear this brought up a lot, especially when a major news media outlet mislabels a country on a map, or when American students are compared to others.
But do you think this is really fair? Is this stereotype really true, if you compare Americans to the world? I can see how maybe well-traveled Europeans who are surrounded by other nations know more about them than citizens of a bigger country that travels less on average, but I find it hard to believe that the majority of Asians or Africans know that much more about world geography than Americans, considering that many countries still don't have as much schooling. How about to other Western countries?
I have yet to see anyone answer the OP's question (though I'd really like to see the data on that one) -- I hate to be Captain Obvious but "Americans are bad at geography" does not imply "Americans are worse than xxxxx at geography".
That's more a problem with time and distances. Because we almost never drive more than a day in Europe (or we take the plane/train), we are quite bad at assessing the time it would take for a very long trip. American are probably, in average, better at this.
Doesn't knowledge of geography include knowledge of distances?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JedlaRoche
I think Europeans are better in geography in average. Living in smaller countries mean, most of the time, more interest in foreign lands and more international news coverage as well.
That's a logical argument but I would like to see some hard data to prove it.
Hey, this big stupid American knows where Afghanistan and Tunisia are on a map too....
And I've met many a European who thought that on their trip to the US, they could visit NYC, then take a two day road trip (stopping at interesting sights along the way) and be in San Francisco or Seattle on the third day. And that's no lie.
We get the same about Canada…from pretty well everyone. Several times while in France I've had people ask me why I don't speak French if I'm from Canada ( Quebec is Canada to many of them ). When I say that I don't speak French for the same reason they don't speak a central African language. They look at me like I'm nuts, until I explain that the distance from Vancouver in english speaking Canada is the same distance as Paris to central Africa…well some get it, some refuse to believe Canada is that big.
@Magnatomicflux….not on the sidelines…but still sipping that beer.
I don't know, many videos on Youtube like showing that but it's known how inaccurate they are (and they could have interviewed other 100 people who knew what they were asking for).
As for Europeans, it is likely that about European and North African and Middle Eastern we are better because of our proximity with these aforementioned lands: I can point out nearly every big/medium sized city and I have a wide knowledge of history and geography (mostly due to my interest in these subjects) but I can barely indicate 20 out of 50 states of the US (although I know whether they are a US states or not lol).
Americans instead will undeniably known much more than me in terms of US geography and history.
On the other hand, we are speaking about 500 millions of Europeans and 330 millions of Americans so the topic is, to say the least, "huge".
Maybe it's true in the US nowadays there's no interest towards intellectualism or culture; hence it might be true that nowadays Europeans are more accustomed to learn,read and write but it's hard to give a definitive and proper judgment on this matter without being aware of massive amount of data regarding these situations.
I think we should all look at the context: Europeans are far more prone to learn foreign languages (maybe except English native speakers) because they have to in order to interact with people in other countries: I can speak Italian (native language), English and French (on a medium level), German and Hungarian.
This not because I am a genius (I wish I were lol) but because of the whole situation of Europe I'm more likely to study foreign languages.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.