Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2015, 12:53 AM
 
723 posts, read 805,735 times
Reputation: 400

Advertisements

A time to build intercontinental bridges and super high speed trains.
It would help get rid of Airplanes and spare the world from those deadly plane crashes and plane disappearances in the middle of the sea like what we now sea in South east Asia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2015, 01:54 AM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,650 posts, read 12,939,609 times
Reputation: 6381
As expensive and as unrealistic this would be, I actually agree with you.

But then again, it will take us an extremely long time if we were to travel from Sydney to Europe or North America. Nobody could cope with a painstaking, tiresome trip.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 03:30 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,639 posts, read 16,017,724 times
Reputation: 5286
Like trains never crash right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Starting a walkabout
2,691 posts, read 1,665,365 times
Reputation: 3135
I see no market for these, except the retired people who have the time to do the week long journeys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,639 posts, read 16,017,724 times
Reputation: 5286
Quote:
Originally Posted by kamban View Post
I see no market for these, except the retired people who have the time to do the week long journeys.
a high speed train can take you from LA to NYC in a half day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Starting a walkabout
2,691 posts, read 1,665,365 times
Reputation: 3135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy-040 View Post
a high speed train can take you from LA to NYC in a half day.
That would be intra-continental. Intercontinental is between continents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 09:11 AM
 
Location: FIN
888 posts, read 1,590,979 times
Reputation: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy-040 View Post
a high speed train can take you from LA to NYC in a half day.
I've heard of something even better, it needs no thousands of miles of high-speed rail infrastructure including electric transmission and generation, which is very costly to build and maintain. No bridges or tunnels invloved. In fact, it can travel between terminals using nothing but the earths atmosphere, with better fuel-efficiency, and it can make just as good time. Better, actually...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 01:31 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,443,154 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic_Vega View Post
I've heard of something even better, it needs no thousands of miles of high-speed rail infrastructure including electric transmission and generation, which is very costly to build and maintain. No bridges or tunnels invloved. In fact, it can travel between terminals using nothing but the earths atmosphere, with better fuel-efficiency, and it can make just as good time. Better, actually...
I think it's still lower, unless rail efficiency really drops with distance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 01:38 PM
 
293 posts, read 316,989 times
Reputation: 406
Perhaps a small vague idea of your concept, but you can technically take a train from Madrid to Moscow and then go from Moscow all the way to Asia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2015, 01:43 PM
 
Location: FIN
888 posts, read 1,590,979 times
Reputation: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
I think it's still lower, unless rail efficiency really drops with distance.
This has alot to do with how the way the train is powered. If it is electric, what is the power source. If alot of coal is burned, does it really make a difference. Especially when considering the distance, any train traveling from LA ta NYC wouldn't be conveniently or from a financial standpoint able to do the trip without a substantial amount of intermediate starts and stops. Several hundred or thousand tons of steel starting and stopping that is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top