Which has better natural scenery, California or Italy? (to live, build)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Are you really under the impression that comparable scenery doesn't exist in CA? I don't know what the point of spamming pics is. Once again, many of those pictures aren't natural.
Then it seems like you don't value nature very much. Buildings and human inhabitation destroy nature. They are the opposite of nature and they detract from natural scenery. This is one of the main reasons Italy loses this competition. It would be much closer if Italy wasn't ruined by people for so long.
Please don't presume to know what I like and what I don't.
It seems you've created this thread with the sole intention of giving California an automatic "win" by pitting it against a county which is smaller and more densely populated. Even so Italy still wins.
Then it seems like you don't value nature very much. Buildings and human inhabitation destroy nature. They are the opposite of nature and they detract from natural scenery. This is one of the main reasons Italy loses this competition. It would be much closer if Italy wasn't ruined by people for so long.
I strongly disagree with this, the strong point of a lot of those place is not the natural scenery itself but the equilibrium between the man-made and the natural part. It is arguable that, because of the building, those scenery are no more pure natural ones, but this doesn't mean that they have been ruined.
Please don't presume to know what I like and what I don't.
It seems you've created this thread with the sole intention of giving California an automatic "win" by pitting it against a county which is smaller and more densely populated. Even so Italy still wins.
I am purely going off what you have said, I am not presuming anything.
I had no intentions with this thread except for entertainment because I was bored.
If you cannot see similarities between California and Italy I cannot help you.
At least according to the majority of voters, Italy doesn't win.
I strongly disagree with this, the strong point of a lot of those place is not the natural scenery itself but the equilibrium between the man-made and the natural part. It is arguable that, because of the building, those scenery are no more pure natural ones, but this doesn't mean that they have been ruined.
Absolutely! It's not as if there are huge, ugly glassy skycrapers popping up in rural Tuscany for example. The buildings complement the natural surroundings beautifully.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
