U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2016, 01:04 AM
 
Location: Turku, Finland
23,302 posts, read 14,446,895 times
Reputation: 10266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gentoo View Post
Sweden, Norway and Denmark
Not on my watch!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2016, 10:09 AM
 
2,493 posts, read 837,645 times
Reputation: 2638
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosa surf View Post
There's no way Panama and Colombia would get together, they had major conflict and separated from each other. They each have too much national pride now to join for anything.

Same goes for Mexico and Guatemala, that would never happen, there was conflict before. The state of Chiapas in Mexico used to be a part of Guatemala.
Keep in mind that this is hypothetical. I am aware of the history involved, but there are many commonalities too. Most of the pairings I suggested would never happen as long as emotions are involved, but they COULD work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 11:00 AM
 
Location: East of the Sun, West of the Moon
12,611 posts, read 13,963,371 times
Reputation: 22236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logicist027 View Post
Let's just get all of Scandanavia in of one country.

Sweden, Finland, Iceland, Norway & Denmark

We constantly talk about them like they are one country anyway. Their flags look the same already.
It was tried already. Big failure. Lots of feeling were hurt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 11:31 AM
BMI
 
Location: Ontario
4,738 posts, read 2,473,916 times
Reputation: 2972
Germany and Austria for sure....why are they separate countries anyway
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 12:03 PM
 
3,308 posts, read 2,074,893 times
Reputation: 2820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Return2FL View Post
Keep in mind that this is hypothetical. I am aware of the history involved, but there are many commonalities too. Most of the pairings I suggested would never happen as long as emotions are involved, but they COULD work.
I know it's hypothetical, and I know it's for fun. I just can't imagine these two happening. Lol

There's maybe a sliver of a chance that Mexico and Guatemala join.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 03:39 PM
 
14,792 posts, read 12,156,172 times
Reputation: 20402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe90 View Post
Not on your nelly!
LOL!!

you know you guys want to Joe,....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Alexandria, Commonwealth of Virginia
1,002 posts, read 481,806 times
Reputation: 962
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosa surf View Post
There's no way Panama and Colombia would get together, they had major conflict and separated from each other. They each have too much national pride now to join for anything.

Same goes for Mexico and Guatemala, that would never happen, there was conflict before. The state of Chiapas in Mexico used to be a part of Guatemala.
Colombia would be happy to take Panama back. But Panama wouldn't go along. For one, it would mean a major downgrade in the standard of living considering Colombia is much poorer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Canada
4,582 posts, read 7,216,720 times
Reputation: 4612
Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest88 View Post
That was discussed during & after the Spanish American War - we annexed Puerto Rico (more or less) & took the Philippines under protectorate status - allegedly to Christianize them, although the Spanish had been there @ that for centuries). We also could have placed Cuba in protectorate status, but passed. In all three cases, there were calls for outright annexation & taking them in as US states. Anti-Catholic & anti-Spanish language (& maybe anti-Black, -Malayan, -Chinese, -Islamic) forces objected in the US, & we didn't annex the islands.

The same discussion came up repeatedly as the US intervened in Haiti, Dominican Republic, Central & South America, Mexico (Mexican American War) & throughout the Caribbean. Each time, the proposals for were knocked back by concerns over taking in a large Spanish- or Native People speaking populations, Catholics or Nativists, Native People populations, under a different (French? Spanish?) legal system.

There were less objections to taking in the Bahamas, Jamaica & other English-speaking islands & nations, although we didn't typically intervene in those - & there was still some concern about the variations in government, the Black & Arab & India populations, etc.

All of this ground has been plowed repeatedly - the exact same discussions took place after the Mexican American War, when we annexed NM, AZ, CO, CA, NV & bits of other states, & the people & tribes already there. If we - the US - didn't carry through on most of these annexation notions when we were an expanding industrializing country & growing by natural increase in population (plus immigration), then it's much less likely now, that we're less of an industrializing economy, & when immigration has become a controversial issue. In point of fact, without immigration, our population would be contracting - & we still have lots of grunt work that needs to be done (plus Social Security & other social net programs need steady income streams).
Well, not really. Cuba was under US military rule for 10 out of the 11 years between 1898 and 1909. And when it was independent, the Platt Agreement made it legally a puppet state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Canada
3,074 posts, read 3,031,652 times
Reputation: 2146
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosa surf View Post
I know it's hypothetical, and I know it's for fun. I just can't imagine these two happening. Lol

There's maybe a sliver of a chance that Mexico and Guatemala join.

Guatemala would have been better off if it had stayed part of Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 10:39 PM
 
Location: Hong Kong / Vienna
4,554 posts, read 4,180,569 times
Reputation: 3868
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMI View Post
Germany and Austria for sure....why are they separate countries anyway
Not entirely sure, if you really want to be schooled on that topic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top