Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All those French-speaking western African countries. Ridiculously small and fragmented. The current borders make absolutely no sense.
Those three Nordic countries.
The Balkan countries
Belgium should desolve and merge with France and the Netherland
Bavaria with Austria
Syria, Jordan and Iraq
Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia
NZ and Australia
Columbia and Venezuela maybe with central America
Chile, Boliviam Paraguay, Uraguay and Argentina
The French speaking West African countries are divided by culture, language and religion. In addition there are some countries that are mostly Muslim, and some countries that are mostly not Muslim.
The Balkan countries, no way, can't imagine Serbia uniting with Albania or Serbia uniting with Croatia. Also there was a war there 20 years ago.
Are you serious with Syria, Jordan and Iraq uniting? Jordan is one of the most stable countries in the Middle East with a stablised and modern monarchy and government. Syria and Iraq is the most unstable countries in the Middle East, with so much disunity with different factions of governments and tribes where they are killing each other.
Australia and New Zealand, New Zealand is too far from Australia to be united with Australia. Also the movement is not popular to unite as one country.
Do you guys think Syria and Iraq should unite after the IS and Assad problems are solved?
I think that will result in Yugoslavia 2.0, except even more disastrous. Kurdistan needs to be independent imo, but I know that messing with the borders in that region in any way is going to lead to war and bloodshed
Not necessary, as the expanding Israeli settlements in the West Bank has brought uneasiness to the US government. Of course they are an very important ally but not always Israel acts with endorsement from the US government.
the u.s goverment unconditionally backs israel across the board
anything washington says with a hint of negativity is just spin
Is there any rational reason why Guatemala-Honduras-El Salvador-Nicaragua-Costa Rica-Panama aren’t establishing a unification? Theoretically, they are able to form a new Mexico below the borders. Isn’t that what occurred with Mexico in the past?
.
Been there, done that. The Republic of Central America, which seceded from Mexico then broke apart.
Central American countries south of Mexico...
Guatemala-Honduras-El Salvador-Nicaragua-Costa Rica-Panama
Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia
Make Bosnia smaller, give a part to Croatia, a part to Serbia (cause 50% of Bosnia is one of those two).
Serbia + Montenegro.
North Ireland and Ireland.
Baltic nations
Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg (they call it Beneleux?)
Not quite. The largest group in Bosnia are the Bosniaks (Muslims) at something like 42% of the population. Serbs are the next largest group. Croats only make up around 15% or so.
The French speaking West African countries are divided by culture, language and religion. In addition there are some countries that are mostly Muslim, and some countries that are mostly not Muslim.
I agree that the borders make no sense, and in many cases fly in the face of and totally disregard the historic lands of the region's many peoples. That said, would merging them together actually make things better?
I don't think their neighbor countries will accept that
they will after the usa levels them
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.