U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is healthier and fitter?
Seattle, WA 4 50.00%
Vancouver, BC 4 50.00%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
Old Yesterday, 11:04 AM
3 posts, read 806 times
Reputation: 10


Both seem to be very healthy and fit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old Yesterday, 07:18 PM
Location: Canada
4,638 posts, read 7,832,315 times
Reputation: 4733
Not an easy answer, but I'll use some statistics.

"King County, Washington, which includes the city of Seattle, is tackling obesity and tobacco use throughout the community. The combined percentage of overweight and obese adults in the county has increased over the past decade and is currently 55.5%" (CDC)

The percentage that was actually obese in the metro was 22.8%,

Obesity Rates for States, Metro Areas


Vancouver and neighbouring areas seem to range around 15 - 20% obesity - similar but a bit less.


This link below shows that the Vancouver area residents who live near mountains are way more likely to get the requisite amount of exercise every week. Seattle doesn't have areas like that right adjacent to urban neighbourhoods so that's probably a point in Vancouver's favour too. It also seemed to show that commuting by transit was a benefit to health vs. commuting by car. Vancouver has a way higher transit commute share compared to Seattle (about double).

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old Yesterday, 07:23 PM
92 posts, read 98,069 times
Reputation: 145
This is what Tinder looks like in Vancouver:

Enough said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old Yesterday, 10:05 PM
Location: Kuwait
2,887 posts, read 995,746 times
Reputation: 2130
Originally Posted by ddomenike View Post
Both seem to be very healthy and fit.
I've spent a fair amount of time and I would give Vancouver the edge on fitness because of the numbers of people you see jogging and biking as well as possibly a more balanced approach to work versus life. Too much of Seattle is caught up in the rat race to get ahead.

I love both cities and Seattle definitely has a much stronger and advanced overall economy which is the benefit of the strong focus on work there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old Today, 01:14 PM
137 posts, read 168,941 times
Reputation: 144
Yeah Vancouver definitely has the edge on fitness attention and focus on people's recreational times. No slight to Seattle, it is much more significant and diversified economically, politically and culturally but I'm there all the time and fitness / the outdoors takes a much further backseat whereas it is front and center in Vancouver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top