Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Writing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2017, 06:31 AM
 
2,144 posts, read 1,877,553 times
Reputation: 10604

Advertisements

It goes along with Wens-day, li-berry, and Feb-uary, etc.

People hear things the wrong way and it sticks. Mispronunciations are passed down through generations. People have lazy mouths and don't care about precision in speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2017, 07:03 AM
 
8,313 posts, read 3,921,805 times
Reputation: 10650
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrandK-Man View Post
Why does it seem the majority of people, from ordinary citizens, to politicians, even a president, and even news anchors, have such trouble pronouncing something that is so obvious as to how it should be???
Why? Because most people aren't particularly wound around the axle about pronouncing words to perfection. The real question is whether the content of their message is useful or accurate, regardless of pronunciation or grammar.

Good example is working with people where English is their second language. I work with Chinese, French and Indian all the time where English is their second language. They mangle the pronunciation of English words frequently which can be challenging, but no one really cares - we are focused on the content not the style of delivery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Removing a snake out of the neighbor's washing machine
3,095 posts, read 2,038,399 times
Reputation: 2305
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearHeadDave View Post
Why? Because most people aren't particularly wound around the axle about pronouncing words to perfection. The real question is whether the content of their message is useful or accurate, regardless of pronunciation or grammar.

Good example is working with people where English is their second language. I work with Chinese, French and Indian all the time where English is their second language. They mangle the pronunciation of English words frequently, which can be challenging, but no one really cares - we are focused on the content not the style of delivery.
Funny how so many of those Asian, European, or Latino folks manage to not screw up NUCLEAR!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 07:53 AM
 
19,116 posts, read 25,309,475 times
Reputation: 25423
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrandK-Man View Post
And by the way, you couldn't possibly miss a more recent White House occupant - Bush II - who consistently mispronounced nuclear as nu-q-ler.
I may well be older than you are, but I vividly recall being confused by Dwight Eisenhower's consistent mispronunciation of "nuclear", back in the '50s. Even though he pronounced it differently than I had been taught, I thought that The POTUS must be correct with his pronunciation, until my mother assured me that good old Ike was wrong.

A few years later, when I was in high school, l noticed that some of my Biology classmates pronounced nucleus as Nuke-U-Lus. The teacher's attempts at correcting their pronunciation were almost always unsuccessful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 08:46 AM
 
8,313 posts, read 3,921,805 times
Reputation: 10650
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrandK-Man View Post
Funny how so many of those Asian, European, or Latino folks manage to not screw up NUCLEAR!
Maybe. I remember having a heat transfer class with an Indian professor talking about "steedy state" conditions, took a few rounds before I realized he meant "steady state". Point is that he understood heat transfer which is all any of us cared about, we were not worrying about his mangling of English pronunciation, we were focused on understanding the science (and passing his tests!).

Last edited by GearHeadDave; 08-09-2017 at 09:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Removing a snake out of the neighbor's washing machine
3,095 posts, read 2,038,399 times
Reputation: 2305
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearHeadDave View Post
Maybe. I remember having a heat transfer class with an Indian professor talking about "steedy state" conditions, took a few rounds before I realized he meant "steady state". Point is that he understood heat transfer which is all any of us cared about, we were not worrying about his mangling of English pronunciation, we were focused on understanding the science (and passing his tests!).
I would not have given "steedy" state a second thought, unless someone next to me pointed it out.
But nu-q-ler.. Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 03:19 PM
 
Location: SoCal
14,530 posts, read 20,109,373 times
Reputation: 10539
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrandK-Man View Post
Thanks, Lovehound, for getting what others on this thread didn't. And by the way, you couldn't possibly miss a more recent White House occupant - Bush II - who consistently mispronounced nuclear as nu-q-ler.

As with you, proper grammar and pronunciation matters to me. I could also get started on that cringing redundancy I hear people mutter on their mobiles: "Where are you AT?", but given current global events, I think we'll just focus on nuclear, since we will all be hearing and using that word a lot more in coming weeks....
Thanks! I usually get it, because I'm constantly working on improving my knowledge and skills, particularly language skills since I'd like to do some professional writing.

Given the current global situation I hope we are able to hear about nuclear related matters, as opposed to experiencing them personally. I haven't seen the world situation this bad since the Cuban missile crisis, and given that two unstable countries are on the verge of becoming worldwide nuclear threats I'm not looking forward to what our future may be.

Thanks for the correction on the nuke-you-ler president Bush II.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
12,529 posts, read 17,536,827 times
Reputation: 10634
Woody Allen used this line in one of his movies 40 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,212 posts, read 22,344,773 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrandK-Man View Post
The title is rhetorical, sarcastic. Of course I know how to pronounce nuclear. But do the majority of everyone else? The title thus asks a question which should not have to be asked in a society with enough brain cells to pronounce it properly.
Because 'nuke' is easy to say. So when the full word is used, it becomes nuke-cue-lare. With the accent on the 'cue'

New-clear is an odd phonetic thing in English. With the accent on the 'new'.

I used the first for years and years before I realized there was another way to say it.

Lots of folks still drop out the first R in February, too. English seems to favor lazy tongues. Few people ever say 'going to' anymore; it's always gonna.

I always marveled at how precise Marilyn Monroe's pronunciation was. She made it very sexy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Removing a snake out of the neighbor's washing machine
3,095 posts, read 2,038,399 times
Reputation: 2305
"before I realized there was another way to say it."

!

There is only one correct way to say it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Writing
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top