|

08-03-2009, 10:00 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Reputation: 10
|
|
Comma or no comma in this sentence???
Big bruha in our household over this sentence - Ms knowitall says wack the commas. I say leave them.
Their excitement was infectious; their enthusiasm, boundless; and their resilence, inspiring.
So, should I leave the red commas? Your input is REALLY appreciated!
|
|

08-03-2009, 10:04 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: in here, out there
555 posts, read 214,364 times
Reputation: 384
|
|
|
You can leave the commas or substitute them with 'was'. Removing the commas is total fail.
|
|

08-03-2009, 10:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
921 posts, read 769,799 times
Reputation: 309
|
|
|
Leave out the commas.
You also need to correct the spelling.
|
|

08-04-2009, 12:00 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: I'm around here someplace :)
1,272 posts, read 436,251 times
Reputation: 494
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lousywriter
Big bruha in our household over this sentence - Ms knowitall says wack the commas. I say leave them.
Their excitement was infectious; their enthusiasm, boundless; and their resilence, inspiring.
So, should I leave the red commas? Your input is REALLY appreciated!
|
leave them in
|
|

08-04-2009, 12:53 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Six months here, six months there
1,816 posts, read 2,005,423 times
Reputation: 885
|
|
|
"Their excitement was infectious, their enthusiasm boundless, and their resilence inspiring."
This is the way I would do it. It's too choppy otherwise. I only use a semicolon when changing ideas not in seperating them.
|
|

08-04-2009, 01:59 AM
|
|
Ballroom Diva
Status:
"Ho Ho Ho!"
(set 6 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
11,538 posts, read 6,941,172 times
Reputation: 7735
|
|
I agree with Sgoldie - but resilence is spelled "resilience". 
|
|

08-04-2009, 06:06 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brooklyn
16,696 posts, read 3,340,389 times
Reputation: 3161
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinkle Toes
I agree with Sgoldie - but resilence is spelled "resilience". 
|
Seconded! The sentence as written by Sgoldie (with Twinkle Toes' spelling correction) is the right one.
There is, you know, a tendency to, how shall I say, overuse, if not actually misuse, the comma.
|
|

08-04-2009, 08:15 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere out there
1,046 posts, read 333,251 times
Reputation: 645
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lousywriter
Big bruha in our household over this sentence - Ms knowitall says wack the commas. I say leave them.
Their excitement was infectious; their enthusiasm, boundless; and their resilence, inspiring.
So, should I leave the red commas? Your input is REALLY appreciated!
|
I would actually do:
"Their excitement was infectious; their enthusiasm, boundless; their resilience--inspiring."
You can take out the commas but it will mean something different (i.e. you will not be placing emphasis on the words after the commas.) At the end of the day, it depends on what you are trying to say/communicate. In fact, it is inadequate to edit this sentence out of context. Moreover, it depends on whom you are writing for and your audience.
|
|

08-04-2009, 09:29 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
1,200 posts, read 357,644 times
Reputation: 864
|
|
|
S goldie's way or out.
|
|

08-05-2009, 12:16 AM
|
|
Genealogy and Illinois mod
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Not where you ever lived
3,077 posts, read 1,705,341 times
Reputation: 1149
|
|
|
I think it is unbalanced because the tense changed.
Their excitement was infectious; their enthusiasm was boundless; and their resilience was inspiring.
I would write it a little differently. Their boundless energy was exciting, enthusiastic and inspiring.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|