|
Back to: Concord, MI, Michigan, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Michigan forum.
405 S. MAIN STREET
Concord, MI 49237
County: Jackson
Grade span: 9 - 12
Phone: (517) 524-6722 (make sure to verify first before calling)
Enrollment in Of Opportunity School
2007 Student Enrollment: 31
Female Enrollment : 11
Male Enrollment : 20
9th Grade Enrollment : 7
10th Grade Enrollment : 13
11th Grade Enrollment : 9
12th Grade Enrollment : 2
9th Grade Female Enrollment : 4
10th Grade Female Enrollment : 5
11th Grade Female Enrollment : 2
9th Grade Male Enrollment : 3
10th Grade Male Enrollment : 8
11th Grade Male Enrollment : 7
12th Grade Male Enrollment : 2
White Enrollment (%): 96.8% | Here: | 96.8% | | State average from 3483 schools: | 70.4% |
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 3.2% | Here: | 3.2% | | State average from 3483 schools: | 4.9% |
Genders in Of Opportunity School
Grades in Of Opportunity School
Races in Of Opportunity School
2006 Student Enrollment: 27
Female Enrollment : 13
Male Enrollment : 14
Special Education Enrollment : 27
Special Education Female Enrollment : 13
Special Education Male Enrollment : 14
White Enrollment (%): 88.9% | Here: | 88.9% | | State average from 3572 schools: | 70.3% |
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 7.4% | Here: | 7.4% | | State average from 3572 schools: | 4.7% |
American Indian Enrollment (%): 3.7% | Here: | 3.7% | | State average from 3572 schools: | 1.2% |
Genders in Of Opportunity School
Races in Of Opportunity School
2005 Student Enrollment: 24
Female Enrollment : 13
Male Enrollment : 11
Special Education Enrollment : 24
Special Education Female Enrollment : 13
Special Education Male Enrollment : 11
White Enrollment (%): 95.8% | Here: | 95.8% | | State average from 3644 schools: | 70.9% |
American Indian Enrollment (%): 4.2% | Here: | 4.2% | | State average from 3644 schools: | 1.2% |
Genders in Of Opportunity School
Races in Of Opportunity School
2004 Student Enrollment: 25
Female Enrollment : 16
Male Enrollment : 9
Special Education Enrollment : 25
Special Education Female Enrollment : 16
Special Education Male Enrollment : 9
White Enrollment (%): 96.0% | Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 3582 schools: | 72.3% |
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 4.0% | This school: | 4.0% | | State average from 3582 schools: | 4.5% |
Genders in Of Opportunity School
Races in Of Opportunity School
2003 Student Enrollment: 34
Female Enrollment : 14
Male Enrollment : 20
Special Education Enrollment : 34
Special Education Female Enrollment : 14
Special Education Male Enrollment : 20
White Enrollment (%): 94.1% | Here: | 94.1% | | State average from 3497 schools: | 73.5% |
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 5.9% | Here: | 5.9% | | State average from 3497 schools: | 4.3% |
Genders in Of Opportunity School
Races in Of Opportunity School
2002 Student Enrollment: 38
Female Enrollment : 13
Male Enrollment : 25
Special Education Enrollment : 38
Special Education Female Enrollment : 13
Special Education Male Enrollment : 25
White Enrollment (%): 97.4% | Here: | 97.4% | | State average from 3348 schools: | 74.2% |
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 2.6% | Here: | 2.6% | | State average from 3348 schools: | 4.0% |
Genders in Of Opportunity School
Races in Of Opportunity School
2001 Student Enrollment: 28
Female Enrollment : 9
Male Enrollment : 19
9th Grade Female Enrollment : 2
10th Grade Female Enrollment : 2
11th Grade Female Enrollment : 3
12th Grade Female Enrollment : 2
9th Grade Male Enrollment : 4
10th Grade Male Enrollment : 7
12th Grade Male Enrollment : 5
White Enrollment (%): 100.0% | Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 3201 schools: | 76.6% |
Genders in Of Opportunity School
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Statistics:
Met Overall AYP : No
Met Math AYP : No
School Safety Practices:
Warning codes used to alert faculty of a critical incident : Yes
Tactical evacuation route for students or entry routes for emergency support teams : Yes
Off-site staging area for assembly and communication at the onset of critical incident : Yes
Emergency communication tree or plan : Yes
Facility blueprints and site plan on file with emergency support team : Yes
Control access to site during school hours (doors locked or monitored) : Yes
Control access to grounds during school hours (gates locked or monitored) : Yes
Students required to pass through metal detectors each day : No
Visitors required to pass through metal detectors : No
Campus closed for most students during lunch : No
Integrated home-land security in school practices into school safety plans : Yes
Random sweeps for weapons : No
Require clear book bags or ban book bags : No
Require students to wear badges or picture IDs : No
Require staff to wear badges or picture IDs : No
Provide staff training in risk assessment : Yes
Security cameras used to monitor the school : No
Telephones provided in most classrooms : Yes
Emergency button provided in lavatories : No
In compliance with the state law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school be expelled for one year : Yes
In compliance with Elem. and Sec. Edu. Act (ESEA), that requires referral to juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to school : Yes
School wide training in positive behavioral support and interventions : No
School Safety Plans:
Safety plan exists - Shootings : Yes
Safety plan exists - Riots : No
Safety plan exists - Bomb scares or comparable threats (excluding fire) : Yes
Safety plan exists - Disaster planning (tornadoes, floods, chemical spill, etc.) : Yes
Safety plan exists - Hostages : Yes
Safety plan exists - Lock down : Yes
School Prevention Programs:
Implemented a violence prevention curriculum : No
Practiced behavior modification/intervention with students : Yes
Provided group counseling (social work) or therapeutic activity for students : No
Provided peer mentoring or coaching program : Yes
Provided peer mediation (student court) in resolving conduct problems : No
Provided conflict resolution training to staff and students : No
Provided programs that promote a sense of social integration among students : No
Established a hot line for students to report problems : No
Provided training and assistance in classroom management to teachers : No
Revised or reviewed school wide discipline policy : Yes
Made architectural or environmental modifications to reduce crime or violence : No
Used a paid law enforcement or security service : No
Implemented a drug prevention service : No
Conducted community service projects on prevention : No
Implemented teacher/staff training on violence/drug prevention : No
Conducted public/parent awareness activities on violence/drug prevention : No
Offered after-school or before-school programs : No
Provided alternative education programs : Yes
Underwent curriculum acquisition or development : Yes
Provided services for out-of-school youth (school-age) : No
Administered special one-time events (not included in the above mentioned programs) : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence-prevention services via joint service delivery (including referrals) : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via teacher/staff training : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via public awareness activities : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via fund raising : No
Allowed students to participate in the design, delivery or critiquing of a drug or violence prevention program : No
Balanced and restorative justice conferencing (aka transformative conferencing) : No
2007 4-Year Cohort Graduation Statistics:
Graduation Rate (%): 50.0% | Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 71.5% |
White Graduation Rate (%): 57.0% | This school: | 57.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 73.4% |
Graduation Rate (%) - Female: 75.0% | Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 897 schools: | 77.6% |
White Graduation Rate (%) - Female: 75.0% | Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 821 schools: | 79.3% |
Graduation Rate (%) - Male: 25.0% | Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 70.1% |
White Graduation Rate (%) - Male: 33.0% | Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 798 schools: | 73.4% |
2006 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Math Statistics:
MEAP Math Results - Of Opportunity School
MEAP Math Results - Michigan
Students Tested : 14
Students Scoring Proficient : 2
Students Scoring Below Proficient : 12
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 14.0% | Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 38.3% |
Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 85.0% | This school: | 85.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 40.1% |
Met Or Exceeded Standards : 2
Did Not Meet Standard : 12
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 14.0% | Of Opportunity School: | 14.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 42.9% |
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 85.0% | Here: | 85.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 56.3% |
2006 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Reading Statistics:
MEAP Reading Results - Of Opportunity School
MEAP Reading Results - Michigan
Students Tested : 16
Students Scoring Proficient : 5
Students Scoring Partially Proficient : 5
Students Scoring Below Proficient : 6
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 31.0% | Of Opportunity School: | 31.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 60.5% |
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 31.0% | Of Opportunity School: | 31.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 24.6% |
Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 37.0% | Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 11.6% |
Met Or Exceeded Standards : 5
Did Not Meet Standard : 11
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 31.0% | This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 62.6% |
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 68.0% | Here: | 68.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 36.6% |
2006 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Writing Statistics:
MEAP Writing Results - Of Opportunity School
MEAP Writing Results - Michigan
Students Tested : 15
Students Scoring Proficient : 2
Students Scoring Partially Proficient : 9
Students Scoring Below Proficient : 4
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 13.0% | This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 44.2% |
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 60.0% | Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 42.3% |
Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 26.0% | Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 10.0% |
Met Or Exceeded Standards : 2
Did Not Meet Standard : 13
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 13.0% | Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 46.5% |
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 86.0% | Here: | 86.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 52.6% |
2006 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Science Statistics:
MEAP Science Results - Of Opportunity School
MEAP Science Results - Michigan
Students Tested : 14
Students Scoring Advanced : 2
Students Scoring Proficient : 3
Students Scoring Partially Proficient : 1
Students Scoring Below Proficient : 8
Students Scoring Advanced (%): 14.0% | Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 1.1% |
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 21.0% | Of Opportunity School: | 21.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 29.3% |
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 7.0% | This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 25.9% |
Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 57.0% | Of Opportunity School: | 57.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 42.1% |
Met Or Exceeded Standards : 5
Did Not Meet Standard : 9
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 35.0% | Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 30.7% |
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 64.0% | Of Opportunity School: | 64.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 68.5% |
2006 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Social Studies Statistics:
MEAP Social Studies Results - Of Opportunity School
MEAP Social Studies Results - Michigan
Students Tested : 15
Students Scoring Proficient : 3
Students Scoring Partially Proficient : 1
Students Scoring Below Proficient : 11
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 20.0% | This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 45.1% |
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 6.0% | Of Opportunity School: | 6.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 17.9% |
Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 73.0% | Here: | 73.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 31.9% |
Met Or Exceeded Standards : 3
Did Not Meet Standard : 12
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 20.0% | Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 48.9% |
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 80.0% | Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 50.3% |
2004 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Math Statistics:
MEAP Math Results - Of Opportunity School
MEAP Math Results - Michigan
Students Tested : 11
Students Scoring Proficient : 4
Students Scoring Partially Proficient : 1
Students Scoring Below Proficient : 6
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 36.0% | Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 43.6% |
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 9.0% | Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 15.4% |
Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 54.0% | Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 31.4% |
Met Or Exceeded Standards : 4
Did Not Meet Standard : 7
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 36.0% | This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 51.9% |
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 63.0% | Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 47.2% |
2004 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Writing Statistics:
MEAP Writing Results - Of Opportunity School
MEAP Writing Results - Michigan
Students Tested : 12
Students Scoring Partially Proficient : 6
Students Scoring Below Proficient : 6
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 50.0% | Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 38.6% |
Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 50.0% | Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 9.3% |
Did Not Meet Standard : 12
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 100.0% | This school: | 100.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 48.4% |
2004 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Science Statistics:
MEAP Science Results - Of Opportunity School
MEAP Science Results - Michigan
Students Tested : 11
Students Scoring Proficient : 1
Students Scoring Partially Proficient : 1
Students Scoring Below Proficient : 9
Students Scoring Proficient (%): 9.0% | Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 28.0% |
Students Scoring Partially Proficient (%): 9.0% | Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 28.0% |
Students Scoring Below Proficient (%): 81.0% | This school: | 81.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 41.4% |
Met Or Exceeded Standards : 1
Did Not Meet Standard : 10
Met Or Exceeded Standards (%): 9.0% | Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 29.2% |
Did Not Meet Standard (%): 90.0% | This school: | 90.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 69.9% |
|