|
Back to: Springerville, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 21.
Address: 725 E. Main
Springerville, WI 85938
Grade span: K-8
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 05:00 PM
Principal: Mr. Steve Chavez
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 333-1060
Fax: (928) 333-2926
Homepage:
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 5
- Grade 8
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 32.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 98.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 98.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2002: 69
Enrollment In 2003: 80
Enrollment In 2004: 56
Enrollment In 2005: 58
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| This school: | 92.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 78.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 4.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 4.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 3.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 6.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 3.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 6.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 3.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 6.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 5
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 10
All Students Percent Tested: 91%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 70.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 10
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 538 schools: | 9.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 34.97% |
Grade 8
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 55.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 14
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 36.16% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 45.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 19
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 53.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 67.32% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 17.48% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 6.84% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 17
All Students Percent Tested: 85%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 21.20% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
Hispanic Tested: 11
Hispanic Percent Tested: 79%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 381 schools: | 30.82% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 390 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 84%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 17.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 84%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 13.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 15.37% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 52.99% |
|