Academy For Community Education (Ace) School in El Portal, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 16.

8950 NW 2ND AVE
El Portal, FL 33150

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mast Academy School (8.5 miles):

94
Somerset Arts Conservatory School (17.7 miles):

71
Dr Michael M. Krop Senior High School (8.2 miles):

52
Mcarthur High School (10.6 miles):

33
South Miami Senior High School (11.5 miles):

20
Academy For Community Education (Ace) School:

16
School For Applied Technology (3.4 miles):

7
International Of Broward School (12.6 miles):

2
Academy For Community Education (Ace) School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
El Portal:

14
This School:

16

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA



El Portal, FL forum
Recent posts about schools in El Portal, Florida on our local forum with over 2,000,000 registered users:
Help identifying best area to live in Miami/Miami Beach?  (20 replies)



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 460-2946 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 8019
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 460-2944
Principal: Carlos J Cambo
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 108
Senate District: 33

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

23%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

36%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

302
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

96%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

54%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

17%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

26%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

33%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

26%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

257
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

91%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1763
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

59%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

26%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

61%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

17%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

13
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

278
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1794
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

50%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1933
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

61%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

43%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

17%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

1862
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1729
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1843
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1866
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1847
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1866
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1964
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

11
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

46
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

24
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 25
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

305
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1846
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
ACADEMY FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (ACE):

298
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1845
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1753
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 92

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1831
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1816
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1781
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 35

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1874
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1884
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1844
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 41

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1907
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1899
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1821
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 78

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 56
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2017 Advameg, Inc.