Ae Beta School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 9.

7510 LAUREL HILL OAKS CIR
Orlando, FL 32818

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (6.7 miles):

98
Millennium Middle School (16.9 miles):

68
Florida Virtual High School (3.8 miles):

60
Silver Star Center School (4.8 miles):

51
Legacy Charter School (4.9 miles):

40
Meadow Woods Middle School (16.3 miles):

23
Scps Seminole Alternatives School (17.1 miles):

12
Ae Beta School:

9
Ae Beta School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Ae Beta School:

9

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Orlando, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 277-1942 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 42
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 381-0907
Principal: Debora Graves
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
AE BETA:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

36%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

457
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 703 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 702 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 355
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 677
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 652

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 678
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 652
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 475 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 475 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
AE BETA:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 245
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 462
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 439

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 463
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 439
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 523 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 522 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 270
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 501
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 482

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
AE BETA:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 482
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
AE BETA:

33%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

506
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 2


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 679 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 679 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 335
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
AE BETA:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 657
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 629

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 657
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 628
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 487 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 487 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 234
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 476
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 453

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 476
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 452
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 461 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 461 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 235
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 427

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 426
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 124 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 124 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

66%
State average from 125 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 122 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
AE BETA:

57%
State average from 122 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 122 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 122 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 122 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

473
State average from 122 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

61%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 672 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 668 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 324
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 637
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 605

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 637
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 605
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 484 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 237
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 459
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 433

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 458
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 432
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 402 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 401 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
AE BETA:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 361

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 379
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 361
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (79%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
AE BETA:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (83%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (80%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (80%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (87%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1311
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
AE BETA:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1510
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1575
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1725
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1858
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
AE BETA:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
AE BETA:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1750
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE BETA:

280
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

57%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1864
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

38%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
AE BETA:

19%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
AE BETA:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
AE BETA:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

34%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
AE BETA:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
AE BETA:

44%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
AE BETA:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

72%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1407
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
AE BETA:

74%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
AE BETA:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1531
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
AE BETA:

14%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
AE BETA:

64%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
AE BETA:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1641
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1701
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
AE BETA:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1808
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
AE BETA:

59%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
AE BETA:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1893
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

57%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1954
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

63%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
AE BETA:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1305
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1539
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1634
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1749
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE BETA:

312
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1900
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1850
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1670
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1425
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1523
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1656
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE BETA:

330
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1683
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE BETA:

312
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1815
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1903
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1865
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1831
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 347
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 289
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 20
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1207
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1526
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
AE BETA:

1534
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1691
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1800
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1748
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1398
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1551
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1606
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1647
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1925
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

136
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

618
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

47
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
AE BETA:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

308
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
AE BETA:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

329
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

287
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

281
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

681
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
AE BETA:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
AE BETA:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

254
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
AE BETA:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
AE BETA:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
AE BETA:

9
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

718
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
AE BETA:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
AE BETA:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
AE BETA:

9
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 323
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
AE BETA:

284
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 264
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

328
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

277
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1613
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
AE BETA:

242
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 55%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1655
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
AE BETA:

1678
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -23

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1844
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1859
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
AE BETA:

1759
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 100

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Here:

688
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 35
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 24
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

234
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 54%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 21%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2018 Advameg, Inc.