Ae Orjdc School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 72.

2800 S BUMBY AVE
Orlando, FL 32806

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (2.8 miles):

98
Ae Orjdc School:

72
Millennium Middle School (17.2 miles):

68
Silver Star Center School (5.6 miles):

59
Piedmont Lakes Middle School (11.7 miles):

51
Origins Montessori Charter School (3.7 miles):

42
Milwee Middle School (11.8 miles):

30
Wekiva High School (11.5 miles):

15
Ae Orjdc School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Ae Orjdc School:

72

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 897-2800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1311
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 4 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 897-2481
Principal: Phyllis Harper
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 40
Senate District: 9

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 5 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 5 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 5 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

53%
State average from 5 schools:

56%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 5 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
AE ORJDC:

73%
State average from 5 schools:

77%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 5 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
AE ORJDC:

64%
State average from 5 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

568
State average from 5 schools:

581
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 5 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 6 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 6 schools:

73%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 7 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 5 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 5 schools:

89%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

53%
State average from 5 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 5 schools:

68%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 5 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 5 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

589
State average from 5 schools:

579
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 5 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 5 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 6 schools:

62%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
AE ORJDC:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 5 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 5 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 6 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

43%
State average from 5 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 5 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 5 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 5 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
AE ORJDC:

72%
State average from 5 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

576
State average from 5 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 5 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

40%
State average from 6 schools:

41%
Minority Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 6 schools:

64%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

58
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Ae Orjdc School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.