Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School in Houston, TX
(PK-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 73
Address
 5503 EL CAMINO DEL REY
Houston, TX 77081
Telephone
(713) 399-9945
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.amigosporvida.com
City-data.com school rating
73
Students
527
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
25.8
Free lunch eligible students
511
School district
AMIGOS POR VIDA-FRIENDS FOR LIFE PUB CHTR SCH
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
SER-NINOS CHARTER MIDDLE (0.4 miles):

90
SCHOOL AT ST GEORGE PLACE (1.0 miles):

81
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School:

73
RODRIGUEZ EL (0.3 miles):

53
SER-NINOS CHARTER EL (0.3 miles):

35
BENAVIDEZ EL (0.9 miles):

22
CUNNINGHAM EL (0.7 miles):

16
MIDDLE COLLEGE H S AT HCC GULFTON (0.5 miles):

5
BURNETT-BAYLAND REHABILITATION CENTER (0.8 miles):

2
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Houston:

47
This School:

73

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 527
Enrollment in 2015: 500
Enrollment in 2014: 522
Enrollment in 2013: 510
Enrollment in 2012: 485
Enrollment in 2011: 475
Enrollment in 2010: 482
Enrollment in 2009: 471
Enrollment in 2008: 432
Enrollment in 2007: 372
Enrollment in 2006: 329
Enrollment in 2005: 302
Enrollment in 2004: 317
Enrollment in 2003: 352
Enrollment in 2002: 366
Enrollment in 2001: 315
Enrollment in 2000: 244

Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students78475741515148535150527
Female students41283016332626272022269
Male students37192725182522263128258
Hispanic students76475641515148525048520
Black students - - - - - - - 1 - 12
White students - - - - - - - - 112
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - 1 - - - - - - - 1
Two or More Races students2 - - - - - - - - - 2

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 78
Kindergarten enrollment: 47
1st grade enrollment: 57
2nd grade enrollment: 41
3rd grade enrollment: 51
4th grade enrollment: 51
5th grade enrollment: 48
6th grade enrollment: 53
7th grade enrollment: 51
8th grade enrollment: 50

Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 269 (51.0%)
School:

51.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 258 (49.0%)
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School:

49.0%
State:

50.1%

Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Hispanic enrollment: 520 (98.7%)
Here:

98.7%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
School:

0.4%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Here:

0.4%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Here:

0.4%
Texas:

2.1%

Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 511 (97.0%)
School:

97.0%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 511 (97.0%)
School:

97.0%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 0 (0.0%)
School:

0.0%
Texas:

6.2%

Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 25.8

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 4
Number of FTE security guards: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE social workers: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School:

20.5
Texas:

15.6

Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,963,726
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 24 (Salary Expenditures: $1,257,186)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5.3 (Salary Expenditures: $118,971)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.5 (Salary Expenditures: $247,051)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 9.5 (Salary Expenditures: $340,517)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $250,401
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,432,183
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,497,286
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7.3 (Salary Expenditures: $164,139)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 9.5 (Salary Expenditures: $400,881)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 9.5 (Salary Expenditures: $369,877)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $306,378

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 475 (male: 227, female: 248)
  • Hispanic: 475 (male: 227, female: 248)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 25 (male: 17, female: 8)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 23 (male: 16, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 23 (male: 16, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 23 (male: 16, female: 7)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 15 (male: 10, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School:

8.5%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School:

7.0%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School:

9.8%
State:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Here:

7.8%
State:

4.1%

Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Here:

3.9%
Texas:

3.6%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
School:

4.2%
State:

4.3%

Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
School:

3.8%
Texas:

6.3%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,534
  • Males4,261
  • Females4,762
  • Hispanic4,544
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,534
Texas:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 22
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 22

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.9 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.6 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.3 (88%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 5%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 82%

5%
13%
82%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,261, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 60%)
10%
30%
60%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,762, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,544, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 81%)
5%
14%
81%

    English I Average Scale Score

  • All4,381
  • Males4,249
  • Females4,491
  • Hispanic4,396
English I Average Scale Score:

4,381
Texas:

3,637
English I students tested: 22
English I # Answer Documents Submitted: 22

English I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.2 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 10.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 7.8 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 6: 7.9 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 86%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

86%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,249, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 100%, Masters: 0%)
100%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,491, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 75%, Masters: 25%)
75%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,396, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 86%, Masters: 14%)
86%
14%

3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,500
  • Males1,484
  • Females1,511
  • Hispanic1,505
Math Average Scale Score:

1,500
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 59
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 59

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

14%
37%
22%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 24%)
12%
44%
20%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,511, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 29%)
15%
32%
24%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,505, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 28%)
12%
38%
22%
28%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,422
  • Males1,388
  • Females1,447
  • Hispanic1,424
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,422
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 59
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 59

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 46%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

25%
46%
12%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,388, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 8%)
40%
44%
8%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,447, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 24%)
15%
47%
14%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,424, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 17%)
24%
47%
12%
17%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,611
  • Males1,618
  • Females1,603
  • Hispanic1,611
Math Average Scale Score:

1,611
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 49
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

8%
33%
26%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 30%)
7%
34%
29%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 36%)
9%
32%
23%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 33%)
8%
33%
26%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,547
  • Males1,554
  • Females1,539
  • Hispanic1,547
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,547
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

14%
29%
35%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 26%)
19%
18%
37%
26%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,539, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 18%)
9%
41%
32%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 22%)
14%
29%
35%
22%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,031
  • Males3,997
  • Females4,071
  • Hispanic4,031
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,031
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 49
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.6 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 47%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

20%
19%
47%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,997, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 48%, Masters: 11%)
22%
19%
48%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,071, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 18%)
18%
18%
46%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,031, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 14%)
20%
19%
47%
14%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,672
  • Males1,677
  • Females1,667
  • Hispanic1,672
Math Average Scale Score:

1,672
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 47
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 43%

6%
28%
23%
43%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 43%)
14%
19%
24%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 42%)
35%
23%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,672, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 43%)
6%
28%
23%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,559
  • Males1,525
  • Females1,586
  • Hispanic1,559
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,559
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 47
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

23%
30%
32%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 10%)
38%
29%
23%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 19%)
12%
30%
39%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 15%)
23%
30%
32%
15%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,898
  • Males3,872
  • Females3,919
  • Hispanic3,898
Science Average Scale Score:

3,898
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 47
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

17%
40%
34%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,872, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 10%)
24%
28%
38%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,919, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 8%)
12%
50%
30%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,898, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 9%)
17%
40%
34%
9%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,690
  • Males1,716
  • Females1,664
  • Hispanic1,690
Math Average Scale Score:

1,690
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 54
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 55

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.6 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.5 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 45%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

7%
28%
45%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,716, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 30%)
11%
15%
44%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,664, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 11%)
4%
40%
45%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,690, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 20%)
7%
28%
45%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,565
  • Males1,558
  • Females1,572
  • Hispanic1,565
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,565
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 54
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 55

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

39%
28%
26%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,558, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 7%)
37%
37%
19%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 7%)
41%
18%
34%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,565, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 7%)
39%
28%
26%
7%

7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,778
  • Males1,778
  • Females1,777
  • Hispanic1,778
Math Average Scale Score:

1,778
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 49
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 50

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.7 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 8%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 37%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 45%

10%
8%
37%
45%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,778, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 46%)
13%
9%
33%
46%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,777, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 44%)
8%
8%
40%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,778, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 45%)
10%
8%
37%
45%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,681
  • Males1,664
  • Females1,698
  • Hispanic1,681
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,681
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 50
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 50

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.2 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.9 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

16%
26%
26%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,664, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 28%)
24%
16%
32%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,698, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 36%)
8%
36%
20%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,681, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 32%)
16%
26%
26%
32%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,854
  • Males3,756
  • Females3,951
  • Hispanic3,854
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,854
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 50
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 50

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.4 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.4 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

32%
18%
38%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,756, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 8%)
36%
20%
36%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,951, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 16%)
28%
16%
40%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,854, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 12%)
32%
18%
38%
12%

8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,804
  • Males1,755
  • Females1,840
  • Hispanic1,804
Math Average Scale Score:

1,804
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 19
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 19

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.2 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.5 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 42%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 37%

5%
16%
42%
37%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,755, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 13%)
13%
25%
50%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,840, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 55%)
9%
36%
55%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,804, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 37%)
5%
16%
42%
37%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,660
  • Males1,620
  • Females1,689
  • Hispanic1,660
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,660
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 19
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 19

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.4 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.9 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

26%
37%
21%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
38%
38%
12%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,689, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 18%)
18%
37%
27%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,660, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 16%)
26%
37%
21%
16%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,066
  • Males4,030
  • Females4,094
  • Hispanic4,064
Science Average Scale Score:

4,066
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 41
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 41

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

10%
31%
32%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,030, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
17%
27%
34%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,094, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 30%)
4%
35%
31%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,064, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 28%)
10%
32%
30%
28%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,888
  • Males3,859
  • Females3,911
  • Hispanic3,884
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,888
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 41
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 41

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.2 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

22%
34%
22%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,859, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 22%)
28%
22%
28%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,911, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 22%)
17%
44%
17%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,884, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 23%)
23%
35%
20%
23%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)

Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School:

3.8
State:

17.4

Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Here:

3.8
State:

13.1


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic19
  • Multirace2
  • LEP16
  • IDEA2
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 21 (male: 8, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Amigos Por Vida-Friends For Life Charter School:

39.8
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 14 (male: 12, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 14 (male: 12, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 9, female: 1)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (All preschool students): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (All preschool students)
Here:

1.9
Texas:

1.4
Preschool children receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 11

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

20.9
Texas:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Houston, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2022 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents