Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Andrews Elementary School in Portland, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 41
Address
 1100 LANG RD
Portland, TX 78374
Telephone
(361) 777-4048
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.g-pisd.org
City-data.com school rating
41
Students
452
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
27.3
Free lunch eligible students
167
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
48
School district
GREGORY-PORTLAND ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
EAST CLIFF EL (1.6 miles):

85
GREGORY-PORTLAND J H (1.0 miles):

77
CLARK EL (1.0 miles):

62
GREGORY-PORTLAND H S (0.9 miles):

61
Andrews Elementary School:

41
AUSTIN EL (3.6 miles):

37
WOODROE PETTY EL (6.8 miles):

25
TAFT J H (6.6 miles):

12
SHORELINE ACADEMY (6.5 miles):

9
Andrews Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
San Patricio County:

41
Portland:

65
Andrews Elementary School:

41

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 452
Enrollment in 2015: 348
Enrollment in 2014: 328
Enrollment in 2013: 338
Enrollment in 2012: 371
Enrollment in 2011: 336
Enrollment in 2010: 331
Enrollment in 2009: 335
Enrollment in 2008: 330
Enrollment in 2007: 335
Enrollment in 2006: 337
Enrollment in 2005: 393
Enrollment in 2004: 477
Enrollment in 2003: 487
Enrollment in 2002: 495
Enrollment in 2001: 510
Enrollment in 2000: 548
Enrollment in 1999: 510

Andrews Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students2688883826564452
Female students - 334041463232224
Male students2354842363332228
Asian students - - - - 1 - 12
Hispanic students1476143484143284
Black students - 2 - 11116
White students1192738312217155
Two or More Races students - - - 11125

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 2
Kindergarten enrollment: 68
1st grade enrollment: 88
2nd grade enrollment: 83
3rd grade enrollment: 82
4th grade enrollment: 65
5th grade enrollment: 64

Andrews Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 224 (49.6%)
Andrews Elementary School:

49.6%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 228 (50.4%)
School:

50.4%
Texas:

50.1%

Andrews Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Andrews Elementary School:

0.4%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 284 (62.8%)
Andrews Elementary School:

62.8%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 6 (1.3%)
Andrews Elementary School:

1.3%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 155 (34.3%)
Here:

34.3%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (1.1%)
School:

1.1%
Texas:

2.1%

Andrews Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 215 (47.6%)
Andrews Elementary School:

47.6%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 167 (36.9%)
Andrews Elementary School:

36.9%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 48 (10.6%)
Andrews Elementary School:

10.6%
Texas:

6.2%

Andrews Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 27.3

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 8

Student/Teacher Ratio
Andrews Elementary School:

16.6
Texas:

15.6

Andrews Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,333,167
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $53,274)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $48,044)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $207,526
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,380,911
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $53,274
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $48,044)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $0

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 36 (male: 22, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 34 (male: 20, female: 14)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 55 (male: 41, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 32 (male: 25, female: 7)
  • White: 23 (male: 16, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic10
  • Black2
  • White10
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 24 (male: 12, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

    Total number of students retained in Kindergarten

  • Hispanic5
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 7 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Here:

10.3%
State:

5.2%

    Total number of students retained in 1st grade

  • Hispanic4
  • White4
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

9.1%
Texas:

6.1%

    Total number of students retained in 2nd grade

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Andrews Elementary School:

7.2%
Texas:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Andrews Elementary School:

4.9%
State:

4.1%

    Total number of students retained in 4th grade

  • Hispanic7
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 9 (male: 4, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Here:

13.8%
State:

3.6%

    Total number of students retained in 5th grade

  • Hispanic10
  • White2
  • LEP7
  • IDEA2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 12 (male: 5, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Andrews Elementary School:

18.8%
State:

4.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White13
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 24 (male: 15, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

53.1
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,485
  • Males1,492
  • Females1,477
  • Hispanic1,473
  • White1,499
Math Average Scale Score:

1,485
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 98
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 98

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

18%
32%
27%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 25%)
15%
31%
29%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 22%)
22%
32%
24%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,473, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 25%)
22%
34%
19%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,499, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 21%)
13%
31%
35%
21%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,463
  • Males1,441
  • Females1,488
  • Hispanic1,436
  • White1,494
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,463
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 97
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 97

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

19%
34%
16%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,441, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 22%)
24%
33%
21%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 41%)
13%
35%
11%
41%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,436, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 24%)
24%
37%
15%
24%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,494, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 41%)
13%
28%
18%
41%

3rd Grade (Spanish)

Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,553
  • Males1,556
  • Females1,550
  • Hispanic1,560
  • Black1,516
  • White1,552
Math Average Scale Score:

1,553
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 88
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 88

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

20%
42%
20%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 16%)
18%
43%
23%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 20%)
23%
41%
16%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
17%
45%
19%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,516, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,552, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
23%
37%
20%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,495
  • Males1,492
  • Females1,499
  • Hispanic1,486
  • Black1,443
  • White1,512
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,495
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 88
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 88

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

27%
33%
23%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 16%)
32%
27%
25%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,499, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 18%)
23%
38%
21%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,486, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
34%
28%
19%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,443, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 80%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
20%
80%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,512, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 14%)
20%
34%
32%
14%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,634
  • Males3,526
  • Females3,743
  • Hispanic3,609
  • Black3,555
  • White3,663
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,634
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 89
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

42%
25%
29%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,526, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 2%)
51%
25%
22%
2%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,743, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 7%)
32%
27%
34%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,609, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 6%)
46%
25%
23%
6%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,555, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,663, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 3%)
34%
29%
34%
3%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,579
  • Males1,565
  • Females1,590
  • Hispanic1,572
  • White1,600
Math Average Scale Score:

1,579
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 74
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

23%
39%
26%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,565, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 13%)
31%
38%
18%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 12%)
17%
40%
31%
12%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 8%)
23%
46%
23%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
17%
33%
33%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,549
  • Males1,516
  • Females1,574
  • Hispanic1,530
  • White1,578
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,549
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 74
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.8 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

27%
26%
33%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,516, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 9%)
41%
18%
32%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,574, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 17%)
17%
31%
35%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 13%)
38%
18%
31%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 13%)
10%
33%
44%
13%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,661
  • Males3,645
  • Females3,673
  • Hispanic3,552
  • White3,805
Science Average Scale Score:

3,661
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 74
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.6 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

39%
41%
12%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,645, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 6%)
44%
34%
16%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,673, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 10%)
36%
45%
9%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,552, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 3%)
49%
36%
12%
3%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,805, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 13%)
23%
50%
14%
13%

5th Grade (Spanish)

Science students tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)

An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of disability refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived disability. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of disability constitutes disability harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability: 2
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability per 1,000 students
Here:

4.4
Texas:

1.0
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of disability: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of disability: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2



Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 5 (male: 4, female: 1)
  • Hispanic: 4 (all male)
  • White: 1 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 3 (all male)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 4

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

8.8
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic19
  • Black2
  • White7
  • Multirace2
  • LEP7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 30 (male: 26, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 17, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

2.2
State:

27.5

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic4
  • White5
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 5 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Portland, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2019 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents